[pure-silver] Re: Kodak... losing weight.
- From: "BOB KISS" <bobkiss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 09:56:26 -0400
DEAR RICHARD,
Did you say Panatomic-x???
CHEERS!
BOB
_____
From: pure-silver-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:pure-silver-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of richard lahrson
Sent: Sunday, May 16, 2010 8:04 PM
To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [pure-silver] Re: Kodak... losing weight.
hi! the same technic works with large rolls of film...i cut fron a @5 inch
roll of panatomic x on a 1000 foot roll....rolls are availkable in a 10 inch
width as well @ebay...but it is b&w dup film...can be used for general
work...rich
On May 16, 2010 4:22 PM, "K W Hart" <kwhart1@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Some time ago, I got a great deal on some 24" wide RA-4 Kodak paper. I
wanted 20x24" sheets. I had to cut the paper pretty accurately because my
processor is 20" wide- actually about 20.5". I set up an 8' table in my
darkroom, clamped down my paper cutter, and put some tape on the table at
the 20" point. I cut notches in the roll paper box and put a pipe through
the core of the roll and rested the pipe in the notches. About an hour
later, I had the entire roll cut down. Be sure to have some music on,
because it's a very boring task!
Ken Hart
> How about cutting down the sheets (to exact size) after the paper has
> been processed?
>
> I us...
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 9.0.819 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2877 - Release Date: 05/16/10
02:26:00
============================================================================
======================...
Other related posts:
