[pure-silver] Re: Kentona Weirdness II
- From: Elias Roustom <elroustom@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 00:06:23 -0500
Hi Mark,
Yes this last test was after the elimination of the variables, and
after Freestyle suggested I switch developers. Their suggestion was
pretty weird though - follow the thread backwards and you'll see.
Kentona does give a pretty good look for the right negative -
contrast and crisp detail. Has a lovely finish, and wonderful warm
tone. Unfortunately for me, it looks better in Dektol than it does in
Sprint. It's not a versatile sheet though, and not worth the trouble.
Some day I'll try it again, if it still exists.
Elias
On Dec 28, 2008, at 10:11 PM, Mark Blackwell wrote:
Ok we are slowly narrowing the possibilities. A couple of things
to ask and to think about. Some things I look at the first print
and either think ho hum or wow. IF it was a look you liked, it
might be worth further investigation to you.
First I would think about how I washed the print? Was it
consistent with the ways you always wash prints. Think back, am I
sure the water was circulating properly? Was the wash aid fresh?
Did you use one? With RC it usually isn't needed.
Next thing I would ask is did you tone the prints with any type of
toner? Sometimes a little fix can stain if in the presence of
toner. Could there be some sort of cross contamination???
Since we know the print was good except the edges, the paper should
be compatible with Dektol. It could be a defect in manufacture.
Is it worth it to you to test another box to see if the problem
continues in a different box? Did the package seem damaged in any
way that might indicate light leaks in the packaging?
Actually in the past I have gone though these types of head
scratchers not so much because I wanted to use the paper. One I am
not the type to want to give up. Even if I don't end up using the
paper again, I have a natural curiosity that makes me want to know
why that stain is there. That brings me to reason two in that
often when the riddle is figured out, I usually have learned at
least one or two things that apply to other situations. If I learn
something its time and money well spent.
Sounds like though in the process you have systematically
eliminated the variables one at a time. Id also make one other
suggestion. Id call Freestyle and talk to them. Unlike some of
the other big photo houses, my experience with them is that they
were more than willing to answer a question if they happen to
know. It may be a common problem, or they might actually have a
list of codes that has some batch numbers that might have defects
in them. It might be something silly and one of those that leave
you wondering "Why didn't I think of that?"
--- On Sun, 12/28/08, Elias Roustom <elroustom@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Elias Roustom <elroustom@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [pure-silver] Re: Kentona Weirdness II
To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Sunday, December 28, 2008, 7:37 PM
And so I did. Here's the result: Dektol stains the
paper, Sprint does not.
This time the stains are to the edges of the sheet only, so
the stunning (my wife and daughter in-front of the tree on
Christmas morning) print is presentable.
Elias
On Dec 28, 2008, at 1:23 AM, Mark Blackwell wrote:
Well before you run out of paper you might try one or
two more with a fresh batch of Dektol to rule out the
chemistry. In fact Id make sure I used fresh everything.
--- On Sat, 12/27/08, Elias Roustom
<elroustom@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Elias Roustom <elroustom@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [pure-silver] Kentona Weirdness II
To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Saturday, December 27, 2008, 8:19 PM
Hi all,
earlier this evening I decided to give another try
to my
few remaining Kentona sheets. This time I used
Sprint
developer (not Dektol). And guess what? No yellow
stains. I
don't know how many Kentona users there are
out there,
but if this is helpful to anyone, that's
great.
Of course that's not proof of anything. It
could be
the few sheets that got the stain are the only
sheets that
would. These three sheets exhibit a new phenomena
- some
shiny irregular shaped spots. When turned to the
light the
sheets show these spots as areas of extra gloss...
whatever.
One of the prints looks good. I'll make
another copy
of it tomorrow and that should do it for this
batch of
paper. I don't think I'm brave enough to
try another
batch of it, but would love to hear from anyone
else who is
still using it.
Elias
=====================================================================
========================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to
www.freelists.org and
logon to your account (the same e-mail address and
password
you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe
from there.
=====================================================================
========================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org
and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and
password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe
from there.
=====================================================================
========================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and
logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password
you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
======================================================================
=======================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to
your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when
you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
Other related posts: