[pure-silver] Re: Kentmere Kentona Weirdness
- From: Ray Rogers <earthsoda@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 09:17:42 -0800 (PST)
Cadmium has several actions, in addition to those you mentioned, it seems to
have been primarily used for contrast control, mainly control of lax toes I
belive.
> Also, we have on this list a couple of people with good
> knowledge of photgraphic chemistry: one is... and
> the other is Dave Valvo who was directly involved in
> Kodak's paper manufacturing. Either could answer the
> question about the effect of cadmium in emulsions and
> whether it should affect the type of developing agents which
> can be used sucessfully.
Sorry, I cannot agree with you there.
Dave might be able to throw some light on this but it is a different company
and a different product, and if this is a cadmium problem, then it is NOT a
problem with cadmium, but with whatever the new formulation is, as this, I
belive, is a cadmium free paper.
Fuji has an
> active research laboratory but limits its productl line.
> Evidently Fuji makes excellent B&W printing paper but
> sells it only in Japan. It would be interesting to hear from
> anyone on this list who has used it.
Maybe we could trade and you could try it out for yourself?
>Kentmere is an old but rather small company
The company was recently bought out
> by Ilford, I don't have any inside information about
> what changes, if any, that has made in Kentmere's
> operations.
The Factory is no more. Production is now at the Harman site.
The material is being made with harman technology to emulate the Kentmere
product as close as possible. Harman claims that with the exception of Kentona,
and POP, all is well and customers are very happy.
BTW, Harman downplays it's interest in the Kentmere monochrome products,
stating its main interest was in another product they made used in advertising
for which they held the major market share of.
>Its OK but not up to the quality of Fuji or
> Kodak.
Hummm, that might hurt the feelings of Kentmere fans, but if you change that
sentence to read, "Harman", they would agree with you, but point to equipment,
scale and old technology as the explanation.
--
Yes, by all means describe the problem to Harman, and let us know what they say!
RR
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
Other related posts: