[pure-silver] Re: Hamster was (Glass versus Plastic containers)
- From: DarkroomMagic <info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: PureSilverNew <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 18:06:51 +0200
I agree with that. Buying supplies once or twice a year is not what I was
referring to. But buying run-out supplies to last you for the next 10 years
(and sometimes a few freezers to go with it), is an understandable but
unnecessary panic, which is hurting the industry, in my view.
Regards
Ralph W. Lambrecht
http://www.darkroomagic.com
On 2005-10-29 17:44, "Nick Zentena" <zentena@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Saturday 29 October 2005 10:52, DarkroomMagic wrote:
>> I'm afraid, we are contributing to the market being unstable this way. For
>> example, Peter just dropped out as a chemical customer for the next 10
>> years! Also, in a few years he runs the danger of all his chemicals not
>> being any good anymore, or nobody remembers or has any experience with the
>> chemicals he is using. This might suit his image making, but he is also
>> running the danger of alienating himself from forums like this.
>>
>> I will follow a different approach:
>>
>> 1. I'll buy chemicals when needed in reasonable quantities.
>> 2. I try to be flexible with chemicals, film and paper.
>> 3. I will not reward a company leaving the market by stocking up on their
>> products.
>>
>>
>
> Normally I'd agree with you. But Ilford has already made it clear they intend
> to batch produce some things. So if you want ULF you'll have to stock up. If
> they decide to make 220 it'll be the same thing. I'd much rather order once
> every couple of months. Or drop into the local shop but it's not going to
> happen. Ilford would rather make the stuff every so often forcing us to
> buy at least 6 months but more likely 12 months worth. But how many are going
> to risk the next run being 12 months and not 13 months away? So we'll be
> stuck stocking more like 24 months.
>
> For chemicals I've been mixing my own almost totally for awhile. Other then
> print developer,sistan,photo-flo and RA-4 I mix my own. I could mix
> everything but sistan if I had to.
>
> Nick
> ==============================================================================
> ===============================
> To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
> account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
> and unsubscribe from there.
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
- Follow-Ups:
- [pure-silver] Re: Hamster was (Glass versus Plastic containers)
- From: Philippe Gauthier
- [pure-silver] Re: Hamster was (Glass versus Plastic containers)
- From: Claudio Bonavolta
- References:
- [pure-silver] Re: Hamster was (Glass versus Plastic containers)
- From: Nick Zentena
Other related posts:
- » [pure-silver] Re: Hamster was (Glass versus Plastic containers)
- » [pure-silver] Re: Hamster was (Glass versus Plastic containers)
- » [pure-silver] Re: Hamster was (Glass versus Plastic containers)
- » [pure-silver] Re: Hamster was (Glass versus Plastic containers)
- » [pure-silver] Re: Hamster was (Glass versus Plastic containers)
- » [pure-silver] Re: Hamster was (Glass versus Plastic containers)
- » [pure-silver] Re: Hamster was (Glass versus Plastic containers)
- » [pure-silver] Re: Hamster was (Glass versus Plastic containers)
- » [pure-silver] Re: Hamster was (Glass versus Plastic containers)
- » [pure-silver] Re: Hamster was (Glass versus Plastic containers)
- » [pure-silver] Re: Hamster was (Glass versus Plastic containers)
- » [pure-silver] Re: Hamster was (Glass versus Plastic containers)
- » [pure-silver] Re: Hamster was (Glass versus Plastic containers)
- » [pure-silver] Re: Hamster was (Glass versus Plastic containers)
- » [pure-silver] Re: Hamster was (Glass versus Plastic containers)
- » [pure-silver] Re: Hamster was (Glass versus Plastic containers)
- » [pure-silver] Re: Hamster was (Glass versus Plastic containers)
- » [pure-silver] Re: Hamster was (Glass versus Plastic containers)
- [pure-silver] Re: Hamster was (Glass versus Plastic containers)
- From: Philippe Gauthier
- [pure-silver] Re: Hamster was (Glass versus Plastic containers)
- From: Claudio Bonavolta
- [pure-silver] Re: Hamster was (Glass versus Plastic containers)
- From: Nick Zentena