[pure-silver] Re: HC-110 vs D-76
- From: "Richard Knoppow" <dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 19:22:43 -0700
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bogdan Karasek" <bkarasek@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 5:46 PM
Subject: [pure-silver] HC-110 vs D-76
Hi,
I just got back from the photo store and they were out of
D-76 on the shelf. While somebody was getting more from
the storeroom, I asked if I could replace D-76 with
HC-110. On more than one occasion, I have heard say, that
the only difference between the two was that one was
liquid and thus easier to mix as opposed to D-76 where you
have to heat the water to 120°F and so forth. Tonight, I
was told that they are similar but that HC-110 gives a
higher contrast but that If I played around with the
dilution, it could probably give comparable results to
D-76. This is contrary to everything that I have heard up
till now.
So what is the difference between the two? By the way, I
use D-76 to develop Tri-X (200 asa) for 10.5 minutes,
68°F.
Cheers,
Bogdan
D-76 and HC-110 are both usable on most films but do not
give identical results. For some idea of the difference
compare the curves. Kodak shows curves for both for some
films. In general, D-76 produces longer, straighter,
characteristics. HC-110 will shoulder off sooner. D-76 will
give slightly finer grain and slightly more film speed. The
main advantage of HC-110 is that it is very convenient and
can be adopted to many films by amount of dilution.
HC-110 is _not_ either higher or lower in contrast than
D-76, both are relatively low contrast developers. The
contrast of the negative depends on development time. Except
for special purpose developers, like D-19 or lithographic
developers, or special very low contrast developers like
POTA or Technidol, all developers can give about the same
contrast if the development time is adjusted.
D-76 is probably closer than HC-110 to an optimum
developer for most films, but, again, HC-110 has the virtue
of long shelf life and convenience.
---
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, CA, USA
dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
- References:
- [pure-silver] HC-110 vs D-76
- From: Bogdan Karasek
Other related posts:
- » [pure-silver] HC-110 vs D-76
- » [pure-silver] Re: HC-110 vs D-76
- » [pure-silver] Re: HC-110 vs D-76
- » [pure-silver] Re: HC-110 vs D-76
- » [pure-silver] Re: HC-110 vs D-76
- » [pure-silver] Re: HC-110 vs D-76
Hi,
I just got back from the photo store and they were out of D-76 on the shelf. While somebody was getting more from the storeroom, I asked if I could replace D-76 with HC-110. On more than one occasion, I have heard say, that the only difference between the two was that one was liquid and thus easier to mix as opposed to D-76 where you have to heat the water to 120°F and so forth. Tonight, I was told that they are similar but that HC-110 gives a higher contrast but that If I played around with the dilution, it could probably give comparable results to D-76. This is contrary to everything that I have heard up till now.
So what is the difference between the two? By the way, I use D-76 to develop Tri-X (200 asa) for 10.5 minutes, 68°F.
Cheers, Bogdan
- [pure-silver] HC-110 vs D-76
- From: Bogdan Karasek