[pure-silver] Re: Glassless carier
- From: Myron Gochnauer <goch@xxxxxx>
- To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 07:01:45 -0300
My experience is that the need for a glass carrier depends on the
condition of the negative, the base material of the film, the position
of the image on the roll, and the f-stop I use.
Kodak's "Estar thick base" tends to be pretty flat for me. Larger than
4x5, though, even that can sag. Acetate base films seem to be thinner
and more subject to curling (especially 120 size).
I use f/11 when enlarging 120 and 4x5... and f/5.6 with 35mm.
In my case most focus problems are caused by (mis-)alignment of the
enlarger or de-centering of the enlarger lens. I don't know if
quality control has improved since the early 1980's, but I recall a
nicely-done article in Camera & Darkroom (??) about enlarger lenses.
The most striking finding of the author was that a dismally high
percentage of enlarger lenses, from all manufacturers, were
decentered, so that the four corners of a projected image were not
equally in focus. [I'm sorry I can't be more specific about the
article, but I just moved into a new house, and my photo books and
magazines --- along with my darkroom --- are still packed or otherwise
in disarray.]
My first enlarger, a little Soviet 35mm enlarger-in-a-briefcase, used
glass on the bottom of the carrier. It did a remarkably good job of
keeping negatives flat. It was good enough, in fact, that the enlarger
worked nicely in auto-focus mode. Of course, the lens was pretty
rudimentary (3 or 4 elements, probably) so I had to stop down quite a
bit for reasons of lens optics alone. Curling just wasn't an issue.
For my current enlarger I use a two-glass-plate 4x5 holder (anti-
newton on top, regular on bottom) for almost everything, with a set of
thin black masks to control flare and help center smaller negatives.
An anti-static "gun" made for vinyl records, plus a little compressed
air seems to control dust well enough that I rarely use my glassless
carriers even when curling is not an issue.
Myron
On 18-Jun-08, at 10:33 AM, <C.Breukel@xxxxxxx> <C.Breukel@xxxxxxx>
wrote:
Hi Ibrahim,
For negatives upto 6*6 I use carriers with only one piece of glass,
on top of the negative. Best is to have AN glass (Anti Newton rings
glass). For 4*5 inch I use two glass plates, and keep them very
clean. Dust can be a problem, but in my darkroom it is ok.
Best,
Cor
From: pure-silver-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:pure-silver-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
] On Behalf Of Ibrahim Pamuk
Sent: woensdag 18 juni 2008 14:25
To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [pure-silver] Glassless carier
Hi,
I am using a glassless carrier for a long time. I know that due to
some curling I cannot get everywhere on focus. What I do is to
stepdown to get most to focus. Alternative is to use glass carier,
but in this case the dust, etc is a huge problem Am I doing rit? Any
comments to me?
regards
Ibrahim Pamuk
- References:
- [pure-silver] Glassless carier
- From: İbrahim Pamuk
- [pure-silver] Re: Glassless carier
- From: C.Breukel
Other related posts:
- » [pure-silver] Glassless carier
- » [pure-silver] Re: Glassless carier
- » [pure-silver] Re: Glassless carier
- » [pure-silver] Re: Glassless carier
Hi Ibrahim,For negatives upto 6*6 I use carriers with only one piece of glass, on top of the negative. Best is to have AN glass (Anti Newton rings glass). For 4*5 inch I use two glass plates, and keep them very clean. Dust can be a problem, but in my darkroom it is ok.
Best, CorFrom: pure-silver-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:pure-silver-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ] On Behalf Of Ibrahim Pamuk
Sent: woensdag 18 juni 2008 14:25 To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [pure-silver] Glassless carier Hi,I am using a glassless carrier for a long time. I know that due to some curling I cannot get everywhere on focus. What I do is to stepdown to get most to focus. Alternative is to use glass carier, but in this case the dust, etc is a huge problem Am I doing rit? Any comments to me?
regards Ibrahim Pamuk
- [pure-silver] Glassless carier
- From: İbrahim Pamuk
- [pure-silver] Re: Glassless carier
- From: C.Breukel