[pure-silver] Re: Fur--The Movie was Darkroom
- From: "Justin F. Knotzke" <jknotzke@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 13:50:03 -0500
On 12/02/07, Georges Giralt <georges.giralt@xxxxxxx> wrote:
So if you're a Kidman's fan, go for it, otherwise, you'd better save
your money for a 120 B&W flm....
When I first heard they were going to do a movie on my all time fav
photog, I got excited.. Then I heard they cast Kidman in the role. I didn't
need to know anymore then that. It explained it all.
Nevertheless, I'll check it out when it comes out here..
J
--
Justin F. Knotzke
jknotzke@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.shampoo.ca
- Follow-Ups:
- [pure-silver] Re: Fur--The Movie was Darkroom
- From: Georges Giralt
Other related posts:
- » [pure-silver] Re: Fur--The Movie was Darkroom
- » [pure-silver] Re: Fur--The Movie was Darkroom
So if you're a Kidman's fan, go for it, otherwise, you'd better save your money for a 120 B&W flm....
Justin F. Knotzke jknotzke@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.shampoo.ca
- [pure-silver] Re: Fur--The Movie was Darkroom
- From: Georges Giralt