[pure-silver] Re: Free Kodak Film
- From: "Justin F. Knotzke" <jknotzke@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 17:45:55 -0400
On 10/24/06, Chris Ellinger <ellinger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> When the 4x5 Tri X box is used up, I'm supporting the only company
> that stakes its future on monochrome, Ilford. They may not
> necessarily have been my first choice in film or paper, but if they
> go, my choices will be second-rate. Above all, we need one of the big
> three to do decent variable contrast fiber paper. If that goes, then
> the other alternatives, as far as I have evaluated, are a poor
> substitute.
>
> Regards Chris Woodhouse ARPS
Exactly my thinking. I've switched to Ilford film, paper, and fixer, and
am testing their
developers.
I'd be curious to what percentage of people that buy their film for
quasi-political reasons and how many purchase their film because they just
like it.
I suspect the entire argument, either way, is moot.
But I'll tell you this, between Ilford going belly up and Kodak dropping
film, I'd hope Ilford stays alive. Call it rooting for the little guy.
J
--
Justin F. Knotzke
jknotzke@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.shampoo.ca
- Follow-Ups:
- [pure-silver] Re: Free Kodak Film
- From: Sauerwald Mark
- [pure-silver] Re: Free Kodak Film
- From: Chris Woodhouse
- References:
- [pure-silver] Re: Free Kodak Film
- From: Sauerwald Mark
- [pure-silver] Re: Free Kodak Film
- From: Chris Woodhouse
- [pure-silver] Re: Free Kodak Film
- From: Chris Ellinger
Other related posts:
- » [pure-silver] Free Kodak Film
- » [pure-silver] Re: Free Kodak Film
- » [pure-silver] Re: Free Kodak Film
- » [pure-silver] Re: Free Kodak Film
- » [pure-silver] Re: Free Kodak Film
- » [pure-silver] Re: Free Kodak Film
- » [pure-silver] Re: Free Kodak Film
- » [pure-silver] Re: Free Kodak Film
- » [pure-silver] Re: Free Kodak Film
- » [pure-silver] Re: Free Kodak Film
- » [pure-silver] Re: Free Kodak Film
- » [pure-silver] Re: Free Kodak Film
- » [pure-silver] Re: Free Kodak Film
- » [pure-silver] Re: Free Kodak Film
- » [pure-silver] Re: Free Kodak Film
- » [pure-silver] Re: Free Kodak Film
- » [pure-silver] Re: Free Kodak Film
- » [pure-silver] Re: Free Kodak Film
- » [pure-silver] Re: Free Kodak Film
- » [pure-silver] Re: Free Kodak Film
- » [pure-silver] Re: Free Kodak Film
- » [pure-silver] Re: Free Kodak Film
- » [pure-silver] Re: Free Kodak Film
- » [pure-silver] Re: Free Kodak Film
- » [pure-silver] Re: Free Kodak Film
- » [pure-silver] Re: Free Kodak Film
- » [pure-silver] Re: Free Kodak Film
> When the 4x5 Tri X box is used up, I'm supporting the only company > that stakes its future on monochrome, Ilford. They may not > necessarily have been my first choice in film or paper, but if they > go, my choices will be second-rate. Above all, we need one of the big > three to do decent variable contrast fiber paper. If that goes, then > the other alternatives, as far as I have evaluated, are a poor > substitute. > > Regards Chris Woodhouse ARPS
Exactly my thinking. I've switched to Ilford film, paper, and fixer, and am testing their developers.
I'd be curious to what percentage of people that buy their film for quasi-political reasons and how many purchase their film because they just like it.
-- Justin F. Knotzke jknotzke@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.shampoo.ca
- [pure-silver] Re: Free Kodak Film
- From: Sauerwald Mark
- [pure-silver] Re: Free Kodak Film
- From: Chris Woodhouse
- [pure-silver] Re: Free Kodak Film
- From: Sauerwald Mark
- [pure-silver] Re: Free Kodak Film
- From: Chris Woodhouse
- [pure-silver] Re: Free Kodak Film
- From: Chris Ellinger