The "gag" is that he is comparing a camera representative of the current generation of digital imaging capable of capturing lower light images withslow speed "underdeveloped" microfilm
That left me unconvinced too - and comparing the 100% scan to a 400% enlargement is confusing.
I like film better, and I don't need this "test" to tell me so. Still it's fun to see. I do wish the comparison was better presented and articulated.
Elias ============================================================================================================= To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.