[pure-silver] Re: Contact Prints
- From: Nick Zentena <zentena@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 07:24:03 -0400
On Friday 09 September 2005 22:17, Ritab19106@xxxxxxx wrote:
> I am considering making contact prints of my 120 negatives. Although some
> may think that prints that small are a bit too precious, I think it may in
> fact suit some of my pictures. My question is whether the special beauty
> of a contact print is lost or compromised if the negative is not actually
> in contact with paper while printing, but rather is placed in the negative
> carrier, as one does when making an enlargement? I'd like to avoid cutting
> my negatives if possible.
>
I really like 6x9 contact printed. Also wasn't 6x6 often contact
printed in
the past? I wouldn't put either into a 16x20 frame but in a book type format
it's great.
Go with the suggestion to mask. Ruby lith is likely the best choice.
Nick
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
Other related posts:
