[pure-silver] Re: Chemical substitution A CORRECTION!
- From: "Richard Knoppow" <dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 07:30:27 -0700
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kurt J. Griffin" <kjg@xxxxxxx>
To: <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2007 9:05 PM
Subject: [pure-silver] Re: Chemical substitution A
CORRECTION!
I just picked through most of this thread; apologies for
the late entry. Citrate is a reasonable buffer, depending
on the pH of interest. Unless the pH of wash aid is
extreme in one direction or the other, the citrate/citric
acid will be a mixture of various protonated/deprotonated
forms. pKa appear to be 3.1, 4.8, and 6.4 for the 3
carboxylic acid groups in citric acid.
The best bet is to start with citric acid and then adjust
the final mix to the correct pH with NaOH. Doing it
backwards with NaCitrate and bringing pH down with HCl
will *almost* accomplish the same thing, but will generate
some extra NaCl along the way. In a more complicated mix,
this can be minimized by starting with the various free
acid / free base forms of each chemical, then adjusting
the pH as needed.
Hope this helps,
Kurt Griffin
Tucson, AZ
The target pH of Kodak wash aid is 7.0. The formula given
in the patent is:
Sodium Sulfite 20 grams
Sodium Bisulfite 5 grams
EDTA Na4 0.5 grams
Water to make 1 liter
Working solution.
The MSDS for the commercial product shows that it also
contains Sodium Citrate in an amount similar to the EDTA Na4
but, of course, does not give the actual amount of any of
the ingredients, only ranges.
The patent is USP 2,860,978
---
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, CA, USA
dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
- Follow-Ups:
- [pure-silver] Re: Chemical substitution A CORRECTION!
- From: Howard Efner
- References:
- [pure-silver] Re: Chemical subsitution
- From: Sauerwald Mark
- [pure-silver] Re: Chemical subsitution
- From: Richard Knoppow
- [pure-silver] Re: Chemical substitution A CORRECTION!
- From: Richard Knoppow
- [pure-silver] Re: Chemical substitution A CORRECTION!
- From: Richard Knoppow
- [pure-silver] Re: Chemical substitution A CORRECTION!
- From: Kurt J. Griffin
Other related posts:
- » [pure-silver] Re: Chemical substitution A CORRECTION!
- » [pure-silver] Re: Chemical substitution A CORRECTION!
- » [pure-silver] Re: Chemical substitution A CORRECTION!
- » [pure-silver] Re: Chemical substitution A CORRECTION!
- » [pure-silver] Re: Chemical substitution A CORRECTION!
- » [pure-silver] Re: Chemical substitution A CORRECTION!
I just picked through most of this thread; apologies for the late entry. Citrate is a reasonable buffer, depending on the pH of interest. Unless the pH of wash aid is extreme in one direction or the other, the citrate/citric acid will be a mixture of various protonated/deprotonated forms. pKa appear to be 3.1, 4.8, and 6.4 for the 3 carboxylic acid groups in citric acid.
The best bet is to start with citric acid and then adjust the final mix to the correct pH with NaOH. Doing it backwards with NaCitrate and bringing pH down with HCl will *almost* accomplish the same thing, but will generate some extra NaCl along the way. In a more complicated mix, this can be minimized by starting with the various free acid / free base forms of each chemical, then adjusting the pH as needed.
Hope this helps, Kurt Griffin Tucson, AZ
- [pure-silver] Re: Chemical substitution A CORRECTION!
- From: Howard Efner
- [pure-silver] Re: Chemical subsitution
- From: Sauerwald Mark
- [pure-silver] Re: Chemical subsitution
- From: Richard Knoppow
- [pure-silver] Re: Chemical substitution A CORRECTION!
- From: Richard Knoppow
- [pure-silver] Re: Chemical substitution A CORRECTION!
- From: Richard Knoppow
- [pure-silver] Re: Chemical substitution A CORRECTION!
- From: Kurt J. Griffin