[pure-silver] Re: Chemical substitution A CORRECTION!
- From: "Kurt J. Griffin" <kjg@xxxxxxx>
- To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 21:05:46 -0700
----- Original Message ----- From: "BOB KISS" <bobkiss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2007 6:44 PM
Subject: [pure-silver] Re: Chemical substitution A CORRECTION!
DEAR RICHARD,
Just one favor...when you come out from under the bed, PLEASE tell
me how much Sodium Citrate I should add per liter along with the other
reagents to make stock solution of Hypo Clearing Agent. I want to correct
my formula.
CHEERS!
BOB
I don't know. The only _authentic_ formula I have is the one in
the patent which does not include Sodium Citrate only EDTA. The
amount of citrate by weight listed in the Kodak MSDS is the same as
the EDTA but what is listed is a 5:1 _range_ not a specific amount.
I suspect the exact amount is not critical and I would try it at the
same strength as the EDTA namely 2.5 grams/liter for the concentrate
or 0.5 grams/liter if you mix working solution directly.
I have since discovered a bunch of old correspondence stored on
a Zip disc including some from Doug Nishimura at IPI on permanance.
I am going through this stuff to see what is relevant.
For instance, he contradicts a statement made somewhere in the Kodak
paper on wash aids, namely that the diffusion rate of gelatin
increases with swelling where the Kodak paper speaks of minimising
the swelling to make the diffusion path as short as possible. This
is simply beyond my chemical knowledge. Doug Nishimura is a Phd
chemist directly involved with photographic chemistry so I give
considerable weight to anything he says.
---
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, CA, USA
dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to
your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when
you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
I just picked through most of this thread; apologies for the late
entry. Citrate is a reasonable buffer, depending on the pH of
interest. Unless the pH of wash aid is extreme in one direction or
the other, the citrate/citric acid will be a mixture of various
protonated/deprotonated forms. pKa appear to be 3.1, 4.8, and 6.4
for the 3 carboxylic acid groups in citric acid.
The best bet is to start with citric acid and then adjust the final
mix to the correct pH with NaOH. Doing it backwards with NaCitrate
and bringing pH down with HCl will *almost* accomplish the same
thing, but will generate some extra NaCl along the way. In a more
complicated mix, this can be minimized by starting with the various
free acid / free base forms of each chemical, then adjusting the pH
as needed.
Hope this helps,
Kurt Griffin
Tucson, AZ
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
- Follow-Ups:
- [pure-silver] Re: Chemical substitution A CORRECTION!
- From: Richard Knoppow
- References:
- [pure-silver] Re: Chemical subsitution
- From: Sauerwald Mark
- [pure-silver] Re: Chemical subsitution
- From: Richard Knoppow
- [pure-silver] Re: Chemical substitution A CORRECTION!
- From: Richard Knoppow
- [pure-silver] Re: Chemical substitution A CORRECTION!
- From: Richard Knoppow
Other related posts:
- » [pure-silver] Re: Chemical substitution A CORRECTION!
- » [pure-silver] Re: Chemical substitution A CORRECTION!
- » [pure-silver] Re: Chemical substitution A CORRECTION!
- » [pure-silver] Re: Chemical substitution A CORRECTION!
- » [pure-silver] Re: Chemical substitution A CORRECTION!
- » [pure-silver] Re: Chemical substitution A CORRECTION!
----- Original Message ----- From: "BOB KISS" <bobkiss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2007 6:44 PM Subject: [pure-silver] Re: Chemical substitution A CORRECTION!
I don't know. The only _authentic_ formula I have is the one in the patent which does not include Sodium Citrate only EDTA. The amount of citrate by weight listed in the Kodak MSDS is the same as the EDTA but what is listed is a 5:1 _range_ not a specific amount. I suspect the exact amount is not critical and I would try it at the same strength as the EDTA namely 2.5 grams/liter for the concentrate or 0.5 grams/liter if you mix working solution directly.DEAR RICHARD, Just one favor...when you come out from under the bed, PLEASE tell me how much Sodium Citrate I should add per liter along with the other reagents to make stock solution of Hypo Clearing Agent. I want to correct my formula. CHEERS! BOB
I have since discovered a bunch of old correspondence stored on a Zip disc including some from Doug Nishimura at IPI on permanance. I am going through this stuff to see what is relevant. For instance, he contradicts a statement made somewhere in the Kodak paper on wash aids, namely that the diffusion rate of gelatin increases with swelling where the Kodak paper speaks of minimising the swelling to make the diffusion path as short as possible. This is simply beyond my chemical knowledge. Doug Nishimura is a Phd chemist directly involved with photographic chemistry so I give considerable weight to anything he says.
--- Richard Knoppow Los Angeles, CA, USA dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx =============================================================================================================To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
- [pure-silver] Re: Chemical substitution A CORRECTION!
- From: Richard Knoppow
- [pure-silver] Re: Chemical subsitution
- From: Sauerwald Mark
- [pure-silver] Re: Chemical subsitution
- From: Richard Knoppow
- [pure-silver] Re: Chemical substitution A CORRECTION!
- From: Richard Knoppow
- [pure-silver] Re: Chemical substitution A CORRECTION!
- From: Richard Knoppow