[pure-silver] Re: Arista EDU Ultra

Here's a link to a flickr member who uses Fomapan very well.
Arista EDU Ultra is rebranded Fomapan.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/petrdvorak/2826672276/

Elias

On Oct 22, 2008, at 7:14 PM, Mark Blackwell wrote:
I agree that film "If the job is important" is the least of your worries. At that point, I wouldn't think even a half second about using what I really thought would work best without a thought for cost. IF cost is an issue in a pro job, you aren't charging enough. IF you are on a once in a lifetime trip, think how much would it take to make that trip twice to redo the prints. At that point its penny wise and pound foolish. Film is probably one of the smallest percentage of the cost associated with photography, but its not zero. Actually for me its the paper for b&w printing that seems to cost me more than anything else.
IF the film works well maybe I will try the paper. For me that would be a far bigger savings and it has one other important feature. IF it has a problem, I still have a negative to redo the print.
--- On Wed, 10/22/08, eroustom@xxxxxxxxxxx <eroustom@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: 


From: eroustom@xxxxxxxxxxx <eroustom@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [pure-silver] Re: Arista EDU Ultra
To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Wednesday, October 22, 2008, 4:32 PM
The film scans very well. It can curl like a spring through,
and I tape it face down to my flat bed scanner rather than
try to hold it in those flimsy plastic frames. It develops
well in Rodinal and D76 (I presoak this film for 2
minutes).  I use an acid stop bath - Ilfostop, or
Kodak's indicator stop bath. I make sure I mix all my
chems to the right dilution, I also make sure I'm within
2 degrees from the developer temp. I've seen a pinhole
or dust curl in some frames from Arista, never the whole
roll, never more than a spec here or there. Too bad for one
frame that would have been a great print (I guess I'll
scan it and photoshop it)


My first ever roll of film (ever... since I started doing
it all myself) was HP5+ from a 100 foot roll. Never a
problem that wasn't something I could tell was operator
error. Even though bulk loading is just an opportunity to
ruin a film before you even start shooting. When I've
used up all my other films, I'm going back to Ilford,
(or Kodak I suppose). The cheaper films have their place for
people like me who learn  empirically,  but if I needed to
depend on the outcome they'd get put aside without a
thought.


E.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Blackwell"
<mblackwell1958@xxxxxxxxx>
To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 3:53:05 PM GMT -05:00
US/Canada Eastern
Subject: [pure-silver] Re: Arista EDU Ultra

Well with two different reports, it simply can't be
ignored as a possibility, especially when you consider the
relatively small sample size.  Yet going totally water may
not be my solution.  Instead I am like many people in that
if one pill cures you, two must cure you twice as fast.

The reverse can also be true.  If X is causing a problem,
get rid of it all.  Instead of totally eliminating the acid
stop bath, I think I am going to try reducing the strength
by about 50% and see what happens.  It should help stop the
development with a far reduced risk of pinholes.

I could use and will use a water stop bath, and frankly I
wonder just how much continued development actually occurs
in a solution that has very little developer left.

I also wonder just how far I would need to dilute the stop
so that it goes into a developing tank good, and when it
comes out the indicator says its spent and just use it once.
 It probably would be far weaker than I expect.

I tend to belong to more of the TLAR school of photography.
 For me its more intuitive and less technical.  What's
the TLAR school of photography???  It stands for "That
Looks About Right".

Still for $2 a roll, if its even remotely serviceable,
there is a place for it in my work.  Maybe not a large
place, but a place none the less.

I am curious also to see how this film scans.


--- On Wed, 10/22/08, Tim Daneliuk
<tundra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


From: Tim Daneliuk <tundra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [pure-silver] Re: Arista EDU Ultra
To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Wednesday, October 22, 2008, 1:56 PM
Mark Blackwell wrote:

Janet how strong was your stop bath???


I had a similar thought when I read this. I *never*

use an

active stop
bath for film. Developers are alkaline, stop baths are

acid

- that's
why they stop the development. It is, however,

possible to

get
pinholing when the emulsion moves from the alkali to

acid

environments.

I long ago switched to a running water "stop
bath" for all film
processing. Development does not stop instantly, but

that

just gets
factored into the overall personal ASA/development

times

I've come up
with per the usual zone system calibration.





--- On Wed, 10/22/08, Janet Cull

<jcull@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:



From: Janet Cull <jcull@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [pure-silver] Re: Arista EDU Ultra
To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Wednesday, October 22, 2008, 12:34 PM

 Anyone ever use this film?

 What did

you like or

dislike?

I tried it and ended up with images I would

have

liked to

print, but
with tiny holes in the emulsion.  Not good!







=====================================================================






========================================

To unsubscribe from this list, go to

www.freelists.org and logon

to your account (the same e-mail

address

and

password you set-up

when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe

from

there.
===================================================================== = 




=======================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to

www.freelists.org

and logon to

your account (the same e-mail address and



password you

set-up when

you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from

there.
===================================================================== ======================================== 


To unsubscribe from this list, go to

www.freelists.org and

logon to your account (the same e-mail

address and

password

you set-up when you subscribed,) and

unsubscribe

from there.
===================================================================== ======================================== 


To unsubscribe from this list, go to

www.freelists.org

and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and



password you set-up when you subscribed,) and

unsubscribe

from there.


--
--------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- 


Tim Daneliuk     tundra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
PGP Key:         http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/
===================================================================== ======================================== 


To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org

and

logon to your account (the same e-mail address and

password

you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from

there.
===================================================================== ======================================== 

To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and
logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password
you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
====================================================================== ======================================To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e- mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there. 

=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your 
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) 
and unsubscribe from there.

Other related posts: