About 20 years ago Kodak lost a court case with Polaroid for stealing Polaroid's patents when Kodak produced their version of the instant print camera. Since then both litigants have been outrun by digital and those patents aren't worth very much to either party. Dr. Land's company doesn't exist anymore. Polaroid's remaining business is in the hands of other outfits, producing components of the original line as part of the bankruptcy settlements. But Kodak isn't a one-product outfit as was Polaroid. Kodak is into many different fields, some of them industrial. But the Polaroid case does reveal that Kodak no longer had an enterprising corporate culture even in the 1980s. They reworked traditional technology instead of improving it. They were good at marketing as the leader in an oligopoly. Kodak lost that niche when the economy really went global and new cyber technology changed the nature of photography. Then new competitors became independent of Kodak patents and influence. The decline of Kodak had it roots in a corporate culture that was slow to change. Reminds me of IBM during the rise of the PC. They had no idea of where the market was or how large it could become. And didn't really care. The big oil outfits are headed for the same cold shower. The Kodak CEO is merely a chip off the old blockheads who ran Kodak in the recent past. Bob ________________________________________________________________________ Check out the new AOL. Most comprehensive set of free safety and security tools, free access to millions of high-quality videos from across the web, free AOL Mail and more.