tor 2008-11-20 klockan 14:04 +0100 skrev Rein Couperus: > Hmmm..., interesting. I'd like to give it a try. Can you send me the working > stuff > so I can give it a whirl? Well, I actually rebooted now and had a look. Basically its http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fubar so I don't think I should... What I did was simply to search/replace for everything looking like a linux path. I pointed these to a "pskmaildir" in the same directory. There I created something resembling what should be found in .pskmail. I then started working from the top to fix errors, I then ended up in a state where it didn't crash but did nothing... Thats the point where I kind of figured it could be made to work, if only enough programmer hours was thrown at it... > The way pskmail has been developed you could at best call it a 'fully working > prototype'. > I would be in favor of cleaning/redesigning/recoding it to run > platform-independent, and use the present > implementation as the reference application. We could/should leave the > servers on linux and > make them run on a LAMP server (do away with X and operate/monitor it via the > web server). I agree. > > > I would argue that object pascal in fpc/lazarus would be a good way to > > go, I guess others would suggest java or even c# and mono. > > > > This is all stuff I am not (yet) familiar with, but that is not so important > as > long as the development environment is on Linux :). I guess we can list the requirements and make a choice. Cross platform is one and I prefer a real IDE where debugging is supported (setting breakpoints, checking variables current values with only a mouse over etc). I like java but I do not like the layout managers... I like c# but I don't know what the status is with monodevelop etc. I like lazarus... > > This is not necessarily bad, a lot of the functionality of the intermar > implementation > is specific for their application (maps, grib data, WX broadcasting, APRS > focus etc...). > Moreover there is the language barrier, a lot of users don't use our list > because > they are not fluent in English... > True. > The goal should be, however, to retain the common code base across platforms > to prevent > duplication of resources.... There we agree :-) 73 de Per, sm0rwo