[pskmail] Re: New to PSKmail

  • From: Rein Couperus <rein@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: pskmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 21:49:43 +0200

Hi Fred,

the Mailfile variable is now set by the server, so it is just a 'dummy entry' 
in the 
database.

Gmail accounts indeed need the full address, user@xxxxxxxxxx

I don't know if the server can handle user.something@xxxxxxxxx, I never 
tested that, will do that tomorrow. If it does not work I will change the 
code and send you a new server :) Don't worry, we will find out....

The count=-1 means there is no mail or it cannot find the mail on the server.

Will debug tomorrow (have repaired a bug in the client today :).

Very important these problems come up now so we can do something about them,
our users appear to be much more creative than I can imagine :)

73,

Rein PA0R


> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: pskmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Gesendet: 19.09.07 21:26:14
> An: pskmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Betreff: [pskmail] Re: New to PSKmail


> 
> Rein,
> 
> In my server database, most of the entries have:
> 6: Mailfile = .mailuser
> 
> However, there are some that are:
> 6: Mailfile = /var/mail/N5UNB
> 
> Which is correct, or, are they both correct? I am trying to find out why 
> Goody's Gmail account always returns 'No mail' to him. His entry is 
> .mailuser. Mine is also, and it works. One change I did make yesterday 
> to his database entry was to add the gmail.com domain to his pop user, 
> since Gmail wants the whole email address for pop user. I also can see 
> the server logging onto the gmail server successfully for Goody's account.
> 
> ~QTC 1+
> Req. QTC from 1
> pop.gmail.com|
> USER=k3ng.pskmail@xxxxxxxxx
> k3ng.pskmail@xxxxxxxxx,xxxxxxxxx|
> Count=-1
> 00:15 UTC Sep-19-2007: Got messages list
> 00:15 UTC Sep-19-2007: QTC received...
> 
> ::No mail
> 
> Thanks es 73,
> Fred - wb5con
> 
> Rein Couperus wrote:
> >   
> >> same results occur, I can correct it manually, or he can enter data into 
> >> the centralized database.
> >>
> >>     
> >
> > Chances are the problem is getting the data out of the central data base :)
> > I will do some testing tomorrow.
> >
> > Rein
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >   
> 
> 
> 

-- 
http://pa0r.blogspirit.com

Other related posts: