[pskmail] Re: Hackers?
- From: Darko_9A3LI <9a3li@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: pskmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 12:25:22 +0100
hmm
yes
The problem is more complex than I thought.
73!
Darko
9A3LI
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 11:43 AM, DAVID GRAY <kf4wbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> WELL THAT HOW THEY DO IT WITH LIGHTNING BUT RADIO WAVES BOUNCE
> AROUND A BIT YOU KNOW LONG PATH , NVIS
> ALSO I THINK THERE MIGHT BE SOUNDCARD PROCESSING TIME ECT UNLESS YOU ARE
> THINKING ABOUT TRYING TO DETECT AT THE IF STAGE
> YES IT MIGHT BE MAY BE TOO MUCH AT LEAST WITH OUR STANDARD SSB RADIOS AND
> COMPUTERS
>
> GOOD TRY
>
> DAVID KF4WBS / NNN0LES
>
>
>
> *From:* Darko_9A3LI <9a3li@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> *Sent:* Monday, February 20, 2012 04:53
> *To:* pskmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* [pskmail] Re: Hackers?
>
> Well, not connection timeing, every server must have GPS receiver in that
> case,
> GPS time of detecting signal sending to one "main server" who calculate
> location
> from inforamtion collected from all other "pskmail" servers.
> If "trigger" time diference is more than 0.x seconds (uS, nS, something)
> than signal isnt from the
> same source.
> Main problem is detecting "trigger" and add to it precise time tag (gps)
> or how to do that.
> That can be nice challenge for programmers but very useful (maybe) for
> clients without
> gps and correct entered location to pskmail client.
> But maybe Im asking too much !
> :)
>
> 73!
>
> Darko
> 9A3LI
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Rein Couperus <rein@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Interesting idea Darko, PSKMAIL RADAR....
>>
>> I think our TCP internet connection timing is not precise enough for
>> light speed
>> radio.....
>>
>> Glad the server is back, I need it often from here...
>>
>> Rein EA/PA0R/M
>>
>
>
Other related posts:
