[projectaon] Re: Outstanding Errata Sprint (Week 6)
- From: "David Davis" <feline1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <projectaon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 21:17:08 +0100
I would vote to junk the entire footnote!
I would simply put a footnote at any section involving which tells you to
use an RNT other than three as follows:
"Note that the Random Number Table bonus given here for use of Bow with
Grand Weaponmastery is higher than the usual +3."
That's it! No big deal! No fuss! No waffly speculations about possible
rules, misprints or hidden loyalty bonuses.
Just a concise reassurance to the reader (i.e. "yup, you read that right. It
says +5 here. That's higher than usual. Relax, you got some free lunch! Now
fire your arrow...")
-----Original Message-----
From: Simon Osborne
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2011 8:55 PM
To: projectaon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [projectaon] Re: Outstanding Errata Sprint (Week 6)
On 23/06/2011 18:15, Jonathan Blake wrote:
Draft IV (only getting longer because of expanded argumentation for
the alternatives, but simplified somewhat by eliminating the options
that seemed very unlikely):
Hi
Updated version of Book 13 based on Jon's updated footnote. Read and
review, please.
<http://www.projectaon.org/test/en/xhtml/lw/13tplor/footnotz.htm>
<http://www.projectaon.org/test/en/xhtml-less-simple/lw/13tplor/title.htm#footnotz>
<http://www.projectaon.org/test/en/xhtml-simple/lw/13tplor.htm#footnotz>
The fixes for the simple and less-simple editions seems to have worked
like a charm! :-)
--
Simon Osborne
Project Aon
~~~~~~
Manage your subscription at //www.freelists.org/list/projectaon
~~~~~~
Manage your subscription at //www.freelists.org/list/projectaon
Other related posts:
