On an unrelated matter, I'd like to bring up two points that have been discussed before. First, Deliverance still states that if one's Combat Skill is reduced to 8 or less, then the discipline can by used to raise one's Endurence points by 20. Secondly, my two cents on the 40 miles debate. Let's look at the passage in question: In your lifetime you have gazed upon many awe-inspiring cities, but few compare with the enormous size and monstrous grandeur of Kaag. A coal-black curtain-wall constructed of massive blocks of smooth, featureless stone, encircles this city, forty miles wide. At its centre there arises a gigantic citadel of black marble, pyramid-shaped and slitted with numerous vents to allow what passes for air to circulate within. Note that this means that the overall diameter of the city from outside wall to outside wall is forty miles. The walls are forty miles wide, not forty miles thick. Granted that the Darklords were size queens (Stone-taker, anyone?), but a forty-mile thick wall around their city seems excessive even for them. Recall moreover that Lone Wolf enters the city through gaps in those walls as read here: At first the fortress seems wholly impregnable, then you notice that the outer wall is not entirely intact. Illuminated by the infrequent electrical flashes, you see that a vast section of the battlements, close to the North Gate, have collapsed. Also, away to the east, a mile-long section has fallen outwards to litter the plain with huge black cubes of stone. You are surprised to note that no attempt has been made to repair these breaches and, consequently, access to the city could be effected at either place with relative ease. The upshot of all this is that I have no trouble envisioning Lone Wolf making perhaps a twenty mile journey to the above-mentioned tower (foreshadowing if I ever read it) on foot within forty-eight hours. Therefore, the passage should stay as is, in my opinion. JohnTFS To: projectaon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 13:50:45 +0100 Subject: [projectaon] Re: Outstanding Errata Sprint (Week 6) From: feline1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx pah! preferred by weak-minded fools! /fires zap from deathstaff/ -- http://www.feline1.co.uk On Thu 23/06/11 1:48 PM , Timothy Pederick pederick@xxxxxxxxx sent: On 23 June 2011 20:16, David Davis <feline1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: to be very pedantic ;) the apostrophe is a character (logical entity), and the choice of actual glyph used to render it (curly or not) is up to the browser and font. True. To be very very pedantic, we're using Unicode character U+0027 APOSTROPHE to fill the logical role of apostrophes -- but despite the name, the preferred Unicode character for apostrophes is U+2019 RIGHT SINGLE QUOTATION MARK. I just talked about "straight" vs. "curly" because of the distinction made by the majority of fonts in the glyphs chosen for those two characters. ;-) -- Tim Pederick