[projectaon] Re: Outstanding Errata Sprint (Week 6)
- From: Timothy Pederick <pederick@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: projectaon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 15:28:32 +0800
I'm seeing a fair bit of (what appears to me to be) arguing at
cross-purposes. Since people said last time that my summary of the situation
was helpful, I shall venture to do another one. This time, I'll just lay out
the arguments that I think have been seriously proposed as people's
preferred way of playing.
1. The "Joe Dever got it wrong" argument.
- All bonuses for having Grand Weaponmastery with Bow should be +5.
- All instances of +3 (and that one *ad hoc* +4) should be changed.
2. The "Grand Weaponmastery is intentionally worse" argument.
- The Grand Weaponmastery with Bow +3 is correct.
- *Ad hoc* +4 and +5 bonuses replace this.
- +3 and +4 are worse than a loyal reader's +5, so the loyal reader
gets to use their +5 at all times.
3. The "Grand Weaponmastery is the same as Weaponmastery" argument.
- Grand Weaponmastery with Bow +3 is correct.
- *Ad hoc* +4 and +5 bonuses replace this.
- A loyal reader who got the Mentora +2 (which is a subtly different
bonus) can add that to Grand Weaponmastery, giving them a +5 (or *ad
hoc* +6 or +7).
Correct?
--
Tim Pederick
Other related posts:
