On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 17:36 -0700, Jonathan Blake wrote: > On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Jonathan Blake <jonathan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > Unless we can find new arguments one way or the other, I think we > > should leave it in the readers' hands. > > Rereading the arguments, I think we are warranted to recommend the +3 > bonus, but still leave it in the readers' hands: > > "We recommend that you consider the Grand Weaponmastery bonus to be 3, > but it is up to you to decide which of these alternatives makes the > most sense to you." > except you should say something like "alternatively" instead of "but" alternatively it is up to you to decide ... > -- > Jon > > ~~~~~~ > Manage your subscription at //www.freelists.org/list/projectaon > > ~~~~~~ Manage your subscription at //www.freelists.org/list/projectaon