Woo-hoo!Book 25, here we come. Just a few additions to what you've already said, Jon:
On 25/04/2011 19:15, Jonathan Blake wrote:
(er) 8: Clunk!. -> Clunk! [onomatopoeia: ne] Why not "clunk!"? Do we often capitalize onomatopoeiae?
No, but they are often already capitalised mid-sentence, which is a perfectly acceptable way to add emphasis to the word, AFAIK.
Other capitalised occurrences: 16tlov 273: Crack!; 18dotd 117, 350: Crack!; 21votm 223: Crack!; 23mh 20, 51, 119, 235, 290: Crack!; 24rw 108, 131, 215, 342: Crack!; 25totw 8, 93, 218: Clunk!; 99, 181, 331: Crack!; 175: Clang!; 26tfobm 110, 114, 232, 310, 341: Crack!; 27v 12: Click!; 92: Clang!; 266: Crack!; 28thos 95: Crack!
If we plan on changing this, let's do it all in one go while we remember...
Pedantic as I am, I can't help pointing out that you probably meant "epidemic" instead of "endemic". ;)
Perhaps this is chiefly UK idiom (or even just plain and completely wrong!), but I would have used "endemic" the same as Sean; I don't know anyone who would used "epidemic" instead here. Fortunately, it doesn't matter to the editing. :-)
(er) 61, 106, 129, 232, 251, 282: petrified forest of Helkona -> petrified Forest of Helkona [??] It is always referred to as the "forest of Helkona", so maybe the forest doesn't have a name: it's just the forest belonging to Helkona, like the hills of Tennessee or the beaches of the French Riviera?
Helkona is Giak for "Black Forest". I don't know the Giak for gateau. I guess there's no need to capitalise "[F]orest of Helkona" any more than "Sierra Nevada [M]ountains".
-- Simon Osborne Project Aon ~~~~~~ Manage your subscription at //www.freelists.org/list/projectaon