Re: wx4j
- From: "Octavian Rasnita" <orasnita@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: <programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 22:27:30 +0200
Ok, thank you.
I think it would be helpful if the FruitBasket project would compare more
libraries that are used for creating GUIS, because the biggest part of the
code from the sample programs shows more how to use those libraries than how
to use the programming languages in which the programs are written.
And it would be also helpful to name the libraries that can be used for
creating GUIS which don't create accessible GUIS (as a warning for the blind
and sighted).
Thank you for telling me that the WX wrapper for Java is not good, because
if other WX wrappers create accessible apps, some programmers might think
that WX4J can be also used for creating accessible programs.
Octavian
----- Original Message -----
From: "jaffar" <jaffar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2007 8:11 PM
Subject: Re: wx4j
Hi Octavian. I wouldn't advise any blind persons to use WXJ. You can't
create really accesible apps with it. You will do better with
accessibility with swt or the AWT toolkit. Cheers!
----- Original Message -----
From: "Octavian Rasnita" <orasnita@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 2:01 AM
Subject: wx4j
Hi,
Is anyone using wx4j WXWidgets for Java?
Does anyone know how WX for Java compare with SWING or SWT?
(Does it require more code, does it have layout managers, does it create
accessible interfaces...)?
Thanks.
Octavian
__________
View the list's information and change your settings at
//www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind
__________
View the list's information and change your settings at
//www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind
__________
View the list's information and change your settings at
//www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind
Other related posts:
