Ah, yes. Sadly I was mistaken. Concert A is the A above middle C. Using this as a base and exactly equal exponential steps, my calculator says middle C is 261.6255653005986346778499935233 Hz. According to Wickapedia, middle C is 261.626 Hz Another contributing factor to my mistaken belief is that I thought C was the base of the musical scale and its frequency was always even powers of 2. That's what you get for living in a digital world. I won't argue the facts anymore. Just look them up. Regards, James jimpanes@xxxxxxxxx jimpanes@xxxxxxxxxxxx "Everything is easy when you know how." ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sina Bahram" <sbahram@xxxxxxxxx> To: <programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 6:32 PM Subject: RE: question for the music gurus:slightly programming related I don't believe this is correct. Middle c is 278.4375 Hz, from what I remember, and a quick google yielded several dozen sites saying the same thing. Take care, Sina -----Original Message----- From: programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of James Panes Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 5:41 PM To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: question for the music gurus:slightly programming related No, 440 hz is the A below middle C. Coincidentally, middle C is 512 Hz. Regards, Jim jimpanes@xxxxxxxxx jimpanes@xxxxxxxxxxxx "Everything is easy when you know how." ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sina Bahram" <sbahram@xxxxxxxxx> To: <programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 10:45 PM Subject: RE: question for the music gurus:slightly programming related You could simply generate a sine wave at 440hz, which gives you concert A. now that you have the A above middle C, simply increment and decrement your frequency appropriately to achieve the desired note. Take care, Sina -----Original Message----- From: programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Alex Hall Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 10:19 PM To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: re: question for the music gurus:slightly programming related A rest depends on the beat; it will be one full beat, so a slow beat will have a longer rest than a fast beat. I usually just pick seconds; so maybe I want 5 notes per second, which means my beat is .8 seconds long, so my rest is .8 seconds. A measure will be 3.2 seconds (4 beats). Each note, then, would be 200 miliseconds, so a quarter note is 50 ms. I hope this makes sense. Unfortunately, my note frequencies list has disappeared, but just Google "musical note frequencies" or something like it. HTH! Have a great day, Alex >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Tyler Littlefield" <tyler@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >To: <programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >Date sent: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 20:05:27 -0600 >Subject: question for the music gurus:slightly programming related >I got really bored earlier, and decided to mess with some musical notes. >I found a listing of wikipedia's notes, but the f frequency seems to be off. >Would anyone happen to have a list, somewhere of: 1: the frequency of a full octive--I can just multiply by 2 or divide by 2 to get higher/lower, and the duration for a full rest--I can just divide again to get quarter/eighth etc. >Thanks, >Tyler Littlefield >Web: tysdomain.com >email: tyler@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >My programs don't have bugs, they're called randomly added features. __________ View the list's information and change your settings at //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind __________ View the list's information and change your settings at //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind __________ View the list's information and change your settings at //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind __________ View the list's information and change your settings at //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind __________ View the list's information and change your settings at //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind