Re: Rendering A Four Column Table In Text Format: What's Best For You

  • From: Alex Midence <alex.midence@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 14:21:14 -0600

Hi, Jim,

That sounds like an awesome document.  With the html version though,
why not present it in lists instead of tables.  It's faster to
navigate that way as you can just hit i and go down each list item.
Each list could be separated by headings.  Here's a list of some
things I use in EdSharp to make my life easier when writing html docs.
 I use single chars and then search and replace them when I've done
with the document as a quick way to write:

For the start and stop h1 tags: use { as start and } is finish in EdSharp
For the ul start and stop tag, use [ and ] respectively
For li, use # and %
For paragraph, use & and *

Then, after you've written everything, just control replace everything
with the propper tags and, voi la!  you have a web page.

That, or install yourself a copy of KompoZer, a wysiwyg html editor
that is decently accessible and just select blocks of text and apply
list formatting from the menu bar as you would in word or something.

Just a thought,
Alex M

On 2/11/11, Homme, James <james.homme@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm preparing the documentation for my JAWS Eclipse scripts. I'm including
> the entire Eclipse 3.6 default keystrokes set that I earlier put into an
> Excel file. The table is in four columns. If I render it in plain text, what
> would be best for you to hear it. The columns are Keys, Command, Category,
> and Context. One thing that occurred to me is that I can sort by either
> category or context, then prepare a text version that repeats key strokes
> and commands, and also gives the category and context columns merged. I'm
> also going to include an HTML version of the documentation, but I was
> thinking of just keeping that set in a table. What is best for your reading
> pleasure? I'm also thinking of including a plain text file of the entire
> Eclipse Workbench Guide. Would that be good for you to have?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Jim
> Jim Homme,
> Usability Services,
> Phone: 412-544-1810. Skype: jim.homme
> Internal recipients,  Read my accessibility
> blog<http://mysites.highmark.com/personal/lidikki/Blog/default.aspx>.
> Discuss accessibility
> here<http://collaborate.highmark.com/COP/technical/accessibility/default.aspx>.
> Accessibility Wiki: Breaking news and accessibility
> advice<http://collaborate.highmark.com/COP/technical/accessibility/Accessibility%20Wiki/Forms/AllPages.aspx>
>
>
> ________________________________
> This e-mail and any attachments to it are confidential and are intended
> solely for use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If
> you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately
> and then delete it. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not
> keep, use, disclose, copy or distribute this e-mail without the author's
> prior permission. The views expressed in this e-mail message do not
> necessarily represent the views of Highmark Inc., its subsidiaries, or
> affiliates.
>
__________
View the list's information and change your settings at 
//www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind

Other related posts: