Re: NVDA and Eloquence

  • From: Jared Wright <wright.jaredm@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 10:07:59 -0400

You'll find that most of your compliance with their terms would be hard to enforce until you have to start documenting things related to them. So if whatever you're doing turned into a commercial endeavor or became high visibility in some other way, then they'd be able to ensure you're abiding by the TOS. Up until that point they probably won't know and probably won't care.

On 8/24/2011 9:51 AM, Katherine Moss wrote:
That's why I wonder about the seriousness of license agreements because it 
almost seems as if licenses are just there to scare you.  For instance, I have 
a Dreamspark license, and the way microsoft words it, it almost seems as if 
they have ways to figure out where you're putting your visual studio programs 
and creations.

-----Original Message-----
From: programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ken Perry
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2011 9:40 AM
To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: NVDA and Eloquence


Well I doubt it they would first have to catcht them and since most people 
don't give access to either of them to your computer it would be hard for them 
to catch you.

ken

-----Original Message-----
From: programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jamal Mazrui
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2011 9:02 AM
To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Alex Hall
Subject: Re: NVDA and Eloquence

Does anyone know whether either Freedom Scientific or Nuance have threatened 
legal action if  a blind individual uses NVDA with Eloquence?

Jamal


On 8/24/2011 8:16 AM, Jamal Mazrui wrote:
Thanks, Alex. Since posting my previous message on this topic, someone
sent me the following link to a blog post on the NVDA site:

http://www.nvda-project.org/blog/NVDAAndEloquenceSituation

I am still interested in further discussion if anyone has additional
information or perspective.

Jamal


On 8/24/2011 7:57 AM, Alex Hall wrote:
My understanding is that it is not illegal. The illegal part is the
step many take to accomplish it, loading an illegal dll to provide
Eloquence speech. This dll is from the makers of Eloquence, but is
passed around the internet for free, even though the makers should be
getting their royalty for every time it is used.
In fact, there is a survey by NVDA makers to determine interest in
providing Eloquence for NVDA (at a cost). Of course, that would be
perfectly legal, since NV Access would pay for the distribution
rights, then recoop the cost from users' paying the one-time fee for
Eloquence under their copy of NVDA.

On 8/24/11, Jamal Mazrui<empower@xxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
I am trying to understand the legal issues around use of NVDA with
the Eloquence speech installed with JAWS. I have heard that it is
technically easy to make this work, thereby substantially improving
the NVDA experience. On the blind-mozilla list, however, it was
stated that this is absolutely illegal to do, and even discussion of
the topic was prohibited on the list. I did not realize this was
such a controversial topic, but trust that we can at least discuss
it here, being careful as appropriate not to encourage particular actions.

As I think we know, just because a company says that some activity
is an impermissible use of software does not make it so. For
example, I have heard of the "Jailbreak" issue with the iPhone, and
that this has been deemed legal by an authoritative body, despite
initial protests by a company. Am I understanding that right?

So, I am interested in any official statement that asserts the
illegality of using Eloquence with NVDA. Can someone point me to a
web page?

Please understand that I am not encouraging such activity,
especially since my knowledge of the topic is limited at present. I
do think, however, that if people are being told that something is
absolutely illegal that they deserve some kind of authoritative
reference for that assertion, given the corresponding implication
that one would be a criminal to do so.

Jamal
__________
View the list's information and change your settings at
//www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind



__________
View the list's information and change your settings at
//www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind

__________
View the list's information and change your settings at 
//www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind

__________
View the list's information and change your settings at 
//www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind

__________
View the list's information and change your settings at
//www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind


__________
View the list's information and change your settings at //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind

Other related posts: