Hi Suzie, Is this a Java thing or a web thing? Jim -----Original Message----- From: programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Trouble Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 9:49 AM To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: Java Confidence Was RE: cobol-programming If you want a input field would go blank there with maybe a example to show how to be filled in, or you could use a list box of dates. I got a form that has a search edit and the search stays in field. I am so use to just typing in the blank search fields. That it always tells me no searches found because of that extra word. So I have to clear the word out then do my search. At 08:56 AM 6/9/2011, you wrote: >Hi Jim, > >I can't wait for those days. I have a question on how sites should >behave. I have been assisting in doing the tests before a build is >sent to Acceptance Testing. When a date field is prepopulated with a >date such as the current date, for these tests I want to put in a >different date. I believe the cursor is at the beginning of the >field and if I type something new in it just pushes everything over. >When I am looking for something in a document with control "f", the >previous thing I searched for comes up in the box, but with the >first key stroke it is cleared out. How should my site behave. By >the way, much to my disgust Section 508 issues are at the bottom of >the heap. (grin). What's new about that? > >Susie > >-----Original Message----- >From: programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >[mailto:programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Homme, James >Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 7:47 AM >To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >Subject: Java Confidence Was RE: cobol-programming > >Hi Suzie, >Someday, you and I will have a conversation and we'll be laughing at >these days. Those will be the good new days. > >Jim > >-----Original Message----- >From: programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >[mailto:programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Stanzel, >Susan - Kansas City, MO >Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 7:51 AM >To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >Subject: RE: cobol-programming > >Another thing I had to do was to set the window in JAWS, otherwise >the time continually got reported. I hate to say this, but I think I >wish I could go back to those days when I really knew what I was >doing. I am getting the hang of this Java stuff, however, I can't >say it is fun. > >Susie Stanzel > >-----Original Message----- >From: programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >[mailto:programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Homme, James >Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 5:57 AM >To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >Subject: RE: cobol-programming > >Hi, >No. The mainframe is just a terminal window. There are no real >controls that get communicated to JAWS. My memory of the scripts I >saw ages ago tells me that they are totally based on screen >coordinates. I remember from my mainframe days that you would use >the tab key to go from field to field, and it stopped on some stuff >at the top of the window like a command line, and another field. The >next tab stop was the first line number of the code part of the >window. The next was column 7, where all comments must start in >Cobol. Then, from there to the bottom of the screen, you would have >tab stops at the beginnings of lines and the comment areas. Instead >of reading the line numbers as you moved down through lines of code, >the scripts figured out where column 7 was and read from there to >the right. The beginnings of the fields had ==> by default, so the >scripts could do some invisible cursor magic and find that stuff. >They could also grab the row and column info from the status line at >the bottom of the window to make sure they knew what to read. > >Jim > > > >-----Original Message----- >From: programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >[mailto:programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of RicksPlace >Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 4:45 PM >To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >Subject: Re: cobol-programming > >Hi: When you work on a terminal or emulator using something like COBOL and >CICS do you know if there is a DOM on the Terminal machine. In other words, >I might have my pc running some piece of software to make it attachable as a >3270 to a mainframe. I guess that would be the emulator software. Then there >is the software to link the emulator, my home computer, to the mainframe. On >my home computer running as the 3270 terminal would there be a DOM I could >script to make it more accessible? >I am wondering if I could wire up my home computer to a MainFrame and script >the mashup somehow using WindowEyes to be accessible and fast to use. >Rick USA >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Homme, James" <james.homme@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >To: <programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 3:41 PM >Subject: RE: cobol-programming > > >Hi, >Yes, but it matters which terminal emulator you are using, and if you can >get your hands on a set of scripts that help you work with the environment, >that would even be better. There used to be someone named Glen Sepke who had >an excellent set of scripts that work with those environments. The biggest >thing, though is the environment. The scripts do make you much more >efficient. Once yyou get there, Cobol is all text. > >Jim > >-----Original Message----- >From: programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >[mailto:programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gomal Tao >Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 2:19 PM >To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >Subject: cobol-programming > >Hello, > >Is it possible to do programming in a IBM mainframe environment using >jaws12? The language is cobol. > > >/Gabriel > >__________ >View the list's information and change your settings at >//www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind > > >This e-mail and any attachments to it are confidential and are intended >solely for use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If >you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately >and then delete it. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not >keep, use, disclose, copy or distribute this e-mail without the author's >prior permission. The views expressed in this e-mail message do not >necessarily represent the views of Highmark Inc., its subsidiaries, or >affiliates. >__________ >View the list's information and change your settings at >//www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind > > >__________ >View the list's information and change your settings at >//www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind > >__________ >View the list's information and change your settings at >//www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind > >__________ >View the list's information and change your settings at >//www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind > >__________ >View the list's information and change your settings at >//www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind > >__________ >View the list's information and change your settings at >//www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind __________ View the list's information and change your settings at //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind __________ View the list's information and change your settings at //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind