Re: JNI in Java 1.6
- From: Andreas Stefik <stefika@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2011 09:36:11 -0600
Hi John,
QuentinC is correct. I would add one more thing, in that JNI has been
in the JDK for a very long time, and to my knowledge there should not
be any significant difference (if any) between 1.5 and 1.6 in relation
to it.
My team, for example, has used a ton of JNI code both on 1.5 platforms
and 1.6, with no changes.
Stefik
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 4:20 AM, QuentinC <quentinc@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hello,
> Try javah with only the full class name. It should generate an header called
> something like java_package_subpackage_classname.h.
> Note, I would rather advise JNA for most projects, except if the binding has
> to be very quick. IN JNA you don't have to write any C/C++ binding code, the
> DLL is directly loaded.
>
>
> __________
> View the list's information and change your settings at
> //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind
>
>
__________
View the list's information and change your settings at
//www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind
Other related posts:
