RE: Is GUI Programming Worth While for Visually Impaired Coders?

  • From: "DaShiell, Jude T. CIV NAVAIR 1490, 1, 26" <jude.dashiell@xxxxxxxx>
  • To: <programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 09:55:26 -0400

This at its core is a management problem and not in the way you might
think at first.  Software and hardware choices often get made very far
up on organizational levels by people in Government positions that are
at least GS15's and above without regard to whether that
software/hardware is or isn't fault tolerant.  The underlings get told
to use PowerPoint to do the presentation and have little effective room
to protest even if they're aware they're going to be presenting on a
situation that's life or death in nature.  I would be first in favor of
terminating those that made the software and hardware purchase decisions
and those in middle management that gave the orders for the use of
inappropriate technology.  Those above the first level decision-makers
who failed to prevent such purchases ought to be terminated as well.
For the employees that had to use the inappropriate hardware and
software an all-hands meeting where the terminations were discussed as
well as the reasons for them would be appropriate to be followed up by
training meetings on hardware and software that can be used under life
or death conditions and all low level employees would be shown when it
was appropriate to use what and why.  Anything less than that and you
set up a highly inequitable situation.


-----Original Message-----
From: programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Sina Bahram
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 15:45
To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Is GUI Programming Worth While for Visually Impaired
Coders?

Really? You don't think a more appropriate response is to remove the
moron who uses a slide presentation tool as a way of making
decisions that affect anything other than a presentation?

Just a thought ...

Take care,
Sina
 

-----Original Message-----
From: programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of DaShiell,
Jude T. CIV NAVAIR
1490, 1, 26
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 3:36 PM
To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Is GUI Programming Worth While for Visually Impaired
Coders?
Importance: Low

Let's add Microsoft PowerPoint to that list too, after all when it was
used to forecast storm outcomes in Hurricane Catrina it
removed all the outlier values from the presentation but didn't tell the
designer of the presentation that it was doing that and
give the user the option to prevent that.  The outliers had Congress
seen them would have saved lives.

-----Original Message-----
From: programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of qubit
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 15:25
To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Is GUI Programming Worth While for Visually Impaired
Coders?

speaking of software that can hurt a person, remember the awdy (or
however it is spelled)? Back in the 80s it had a firmware glitch
that under the right conditions would cause the car to startup full
throttle in reverse. 
This caused a lot of property damage, injuries, and the death of a 6
year old child, and there was nothing the driver could do.
Just thinking back.
Hopefully there is more failsafe software out there to prevent such
things now.
--le
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Hofstader" <cdh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 1:56 PM
Subject: Re: Is GUI Programming Worth While for Visually Impaired
Coders?


Automobile "heads up" interfaces are another where graphical issues will

rarely be an issue. If cars add heads up displays like those on
aircraft, there will be a visual component but there will still be
lots of stuff in a car that has no visual UI.

I'm not sure but maybe some cars already have heads up displays that put

something like the speedometer floating in the air some distance from
the driver's face. I know these are in virtually every modern
aircraft but I

don't know if anyone has put it into a car yet. I don't know much about
cars built after 1980 or so.

cdh
On Oct 14, 2010, at 9:36 AM, Homme, James wrote:

> Hi,
> Ken, when you say this, keep in mind the environment the user is using
the 
> device in. While they are driving, they want to reach over and turn up
the 
> volume or pick another tune. They want to keep their eyes on the road 
> while they hear the speech or whatever. While they are in front of a 
> computer, they want to see what's going on, and that needs to be
pleasing.
>
> Jim
>
> Jim Homme,
> Usability Services,
> Phone: 412-544-1810. Skype: jim.homme
> Internal recipients,  Read my accessibility blog. Discuss
accessibility 
> here. Accessibility Wiki: Breaking news and accessibility advice
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ken Perry
> Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 6:37 AM
> To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: Is GUI Programming Worth While for Visually Impaired
Coders?
>
> Really then the IPod shuffle puts the lie to your argument.  A good 
> interface can do without a GUI.  True it's not a high tech device but
it 
> has
> no GUI its cheap and they sell millions.  Oh and the Braille+ also has
no
> gui and well we have a few sited coders on it that like it to use in
the
> car.
>
> Ken
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
> Nick.Adamson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 4:20 AM
> To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: Is GUI Programming Worth While for Visually Impaired
Coders?
>
> Hi.
>
> In answer to the subject field my answer is yes.
> Just a couple of thoughts.
> We have got to be careful about limiting our selves.
> I'm in general agreement with what's been said however we have to face

> facts. We live in a visual world. When I tell people I'm a computer 
> programmer almost the first question I get asked is how can you see
the
> screen.
>
> I also think the idea of an OS which doesn't have a GUI which would 
> avoid having to have a complex expensive screen reader on is a nice
idea
> in theory but there are a couple of points which would make it in 
> practical. This OS would typically be for the VI market, which means
it
> would be a specialist development. This means it would need to be open

> source or proprietary for an access tech company. If you think screen 
> readers are complex they are nothing to a full operating system. This 
> would indicate that the price would be hefty Or not commercially 
> supported in the instance of an Open source OS.
> The other major limitation on a new OS would be support in an
industrial
> environment. For example the company I work for has a specific build
of
> windows XP aloud on the network, it won't let you have other builds of

> XP connected unless otherwise approved and just forget about non
windows
> based OS, not a chance, this is not that unusual in a work
environment.
> Also I would be afraid that it would button hole us and make it harder

> for one of us to get a job as a software engineer. If you tern up for
a
> job interview and you don't have any experience developing for the 
> platform your potential employer targets its another thing that marks 
> you down in comparison to anyone else going for the job.
>
> The other worry is if a blind developer had no GUI development skills
at
> all. As has been said on this thread for a sighted person to put 
> together a gui its pretty quick so its a normal thing a sighted 
> developer can do.
> I'd like to think that I'm someone who will give almost anything ago
and
> try not to let the fact I can't see a screen make a difference to the 
> work I do.
> With this philosophy in mind there are 2 questions I was asked that a 
> normal developer wouldn't have been in the job interview which
resulted
> in me getting the job I've been doing for the last 5 and a half years.
> 1. How would you be able to use the graphical UML design tools and
show
> software design in a similar way to other developers?
> 2. Can and how do you develop GUI's.
>
> Write away there you can see the interviewer seeing problems that need

> to be answered to find out if I can do the job. I know some people who

> would have thought it improper to ask these questions but in my mind
if
> they hadn't been asked there would have still been a question mark
next
> to me when it came down to selecting the successful candidate.
>
> I've been told since that it was the "I may not do it in the normal
way
> but it will get done" attitude of the answers that I gave which swayed

> the panel in my way as it showed my attitude to everything, not just
my
> blindness.
>
> If my answers would have been
> 1. I don't do graphical design. Its pointless, I do everything in a
text
> file.
> 2. I don't do GUI's, other people are better at it than I am.
>
> It shows a defeatist attitude, not something most employers are
looking
> for.
> Yes, sighted people can be quicker at both these particular software 
> skills but other things I bring to the table I could be better at than

> others in the team, not because I'm blind but because I just am. A
team
> is made up of individuals with varying skills.
>
> Lets not get away from the fact that the negative answers above do
have
> an element of truth. If I had my way my design wouldn't be done in UML

> and I wouldn't do GUI development but I don't work in a bubble.
Sighted
> people review, approve and use software and designs that I've
generated
> and as I said we live in a visual world.
>
> Anyway, enough rambling from me.
> Thanks
> Nick.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Kerneels 
> Roos
> Sent: 13 October 2010 16:08
> To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Is GUI Programming Worth While for Visually Impaired Coders?
>
> This message was posted to a reply on the long thread about Oracle 
> accessibility concerns involving Java. I thought I'd post it again
with
> a new subject, since it deviates from the original topic.
>
>
> I can't agree more your this statement Jay. As much as all of us want 
> to create nice GUIs, it is really such such a battel for someone that 
> can't see properly, if you are honest with yourself. I would say that 
> the FB examples are indicative of this, since the FB concept is very 
> simple yet for a visually impaired person to build a GUI  is a massive

> task in all fairness.
>
> I didn't  catch the whole story with the recent critisism of the FB 
> examples, but I can understand why a professor for example would 
> ridicule having the logic and presentation code (GUI code) all in one 
> file. (or any other aspect of the FB stuff that servce the purpose of 
> aiding blind people) It's a poor design choice for anything but an 
> example, but then, that's exactly what the FB examples are -- tools to

> show you simple GUI creation in various programming languages.
> Personally I think it's great and I commend all the contributors. It's
a
> service to the community, but sighted people will struggle to see it's

> worth.
>
> We must understand, for a fully sighted person, building GUIs is 
> rediculously easy and straight forward. No matter what kind of 
> accessible GUI designer tools there might be in future, the playing 
> field will never be level when it comes to anything graphic. Yet there

> is no reason for despair, since there are numerous other areas in 
> computer sciense and programming in particular where a blind person 
> could compete well and I'm speculating that there might even be areas 
> where having no or little sight might aid you!
>
> One particular small project I worked on while studying at university 
> springs to mind. It was a little applet developed with AWT or Swing
that
> saved your bookmarks in a tree structure. The professor was a gracious

> man, and he gave us a nice score for the project, but he stepped in 
> after we did our presentation and basically told the  class that we 
> really did spend much time on this and that we didn't just download it

> from the net or something... He did this, I think, because our project

> was fairly inferiour graphic wise compaired to the elaborate graphics 
> the other student's projects sported even though I spent hours and
hours
> on the little GUI side of the software.
>
> It's heart breaking for me when I read how hard blind folks try and
make
> appealing graphical interfaces, or when I read about the struggles
some
> software causes blind guys. It's commendable to see how people cope
with
> the worst of situations, but there are also better areas to focus on,,

> areas where you'll be far more productive and make a better impact .
>
> It's a complex topic for me and there are much to say about it. What
I'm
> wondering is if it is not a good time to review the way disabled
people
> are trained up to believe that interaction with computers should 
> commence in the generally accepted form of having a "normal" or
sighted
> OS with all highly graphical applications with a rediculously advanced

> and complex and expensive screen reader stuck on top of it all.
>
> And then, on the other hand, how we can identify better software 
> development areas to focus on where blindness poses less of an
obsticle.
> Also, how we can advance in those areas and properly promote ourselves

> and our value to a software development shop developing for the
general
> public or business where accessibility is of little concern. Myself
for
> one have a little bit of a complex when think of all my years
experience
> as a software developer and yet the difficulty with which I'm faced
with
> when having to develop a GUI, and how someone with far less experience

> than myself could code a GUI so much faster and better looking in less

> time and with less effort.
>
> My challenge to the list; let's draw up a specification of areas in 
> programming and computer science where visually impaired people can 
> excell at in the modern age where graphics does play such a ever 
> increasingly important part.
>
> Armed with such a specification we'll be in the right position to
start
> and focus efforts on training ourselves up in those areas and then 
> sharing knowledge and awareness so that a wel trained blind programmer

> (in the identified fields) could approach any development house with 
> confidence of his / her abilities and value she / he will add to a 
> company.
>
> Kerneels
>
> On 10/13/2010 12:31 AM, Jay Macarty wrote:
>
>
>        I would advise spending time on web development with java on
the
> server side. Either that or headless java development such as web 
> services. Both directions can allow a person to grow into a very
strong
> java developer with very marketable skill sets without fighting the 
> constant battle of either swing accessibility or trying to gain skills

> in an API, swt, which may have somewhat limited acceptence in a large 
> traditional java shop. Personally, I love swt; however, as a tech
lead,
> I can't push it into a project here because it is not an accepted 
> technology by our enterprise architects.
>
>        ----- Original Message ----- From: "Homme, James"
> <james.homme@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <mailto:james.homme@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>        To: <programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
> <mailto:programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>        Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 7:02 AM
>        Subject: RE: Credible rumor that deserves serious
consideration,
> IMHO
>
>
>        Hi Jay,
>        Would you advise someone new to Java to spend more time on 
> Swing, SWT, or web?
>
>        Thanks.
>
>        Jim
>
>        Jim Homme,
>        Usability Services,
>        Phone: 412-544-1810. Skype: jim.homme
>        Internal recipients,  Read my accessibility blog. Discuss 
> accessibility here. Accessibility Wiki: Breaking news and
accessibility
> advice
>
>
>        -----Original Message-----
>        From: programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jay
Macarty
>        Sent: Monday, October 11, 2010 3:31 PM
>        To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>        Subject: Re: Credible rumor that deserves serious
consideration,
> IMHO
>
>        Over the past couple of years, I have been involved in hiring 
> java
>        developers several times. One of the things we have had trouble

> with is
>        finding people with swing experience. It seems that, while
there
> are
>        certainly a number of applications still using swing heavily, a

> lot of java
>        development is moving away from swing based GUI interfaces to 
> using web
>        based front-ends. Perhaps, Oracle thinks that a declining 
> interest in using
>        swing as a UI means they don't need to spend as much effort on 
> swing
>        accessibility but that thought path can certainly leave those
of
> us who
>        still need access to heavily swing based apps in a spot.
>
>
>        ----- Original Message -----
>        From: "Stanzel, Susan - Kansas City, MO"
> <susan.stanzel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <mailto:susan.stanzel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>        To: <programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
> <mailto:programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>        Sent: Sunday, October 10, 2010 8:11 PM
>        Subject: RE: Credible rumor that deserves serious
consideration,
> IMHO
>
>
>        Hi Listers,
>
>        I have not stepped into this until now. I would hope that 
> needing government
>        contracts in the United States would have some affect on all 
> this. I have
>        asked people about swing and I am told it isn't used very much 
> because there
>        is newer technology out there. I am not an experienced Java 
> programmer so
>        maybe the rest of you will know more than I do. I know we use 
> Struts at my
>        building for creation of web projects. If I have just made a 
> fool of myself,
>        it's not the first time and won't be the last. (grin).
>
>        Susie Stanzel
>
>        -----Original Message-----
>        From: programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>        [mailto:programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of The

> Elf
>        Sent: Sunday, October 10, 2010 7:08 PM
>        To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>        Subject: Re: Credible rumor that deserves serious
consideration,
> IMHO
>
>        hey, this is my usual line, "beat them into submission" lol
>
>        or hound,or pummel,  or...
>
>        elf
>        Moderator, Blind Access Help
>        Owner: Alacorn Computer Enterprises
>        Specialists in customized computers and peripherals
>        - own the might and majesty of a Alacorn!
>        www.alacorncomputer.com
>        proprietor, The Grab Bag,
>        for blind computer users and programmers
>        http://grabbag.alacorncomputer.com
>
>        ----- Original Message -----
>        From: "Sina Bahram" <sbahram@xxxxxxxxx> 
> <mailto:sbahram@xxxxxxxxx>
>        To: <programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
> <mailto:programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>        Sent: Saturday, October 09, 2010 10:14 AM
>        Subject: RE: Credible rumor that deserves serious
consideration,
> IMHO
>
>
>
>
>                Wow, it only took like 15 emails on the subject, but 
> finally the voice of
>                reason has made itself known.
>
>                Ken, I completely agree. Now is the time to pressure 
> them into actually
>                not abandoning it.
>
>                Take care,
>                Sina
>
>                ________________________________
>
>                From: programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>                [mailto:programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf
> Of Ken Perry
>                Sent: Saturday, October 09, 2010 1:10 AM
>                To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>                Subject: RE: Credible rumor that deserves serious 
> consideration, IMHO
>
>
>
>                If this is true then it's not time to tell people to 
> stay away.  It's time
>                to get people to get active and start emailing and
>                calling them till they do support it.  If we stay away 
> we lose what
>                accessibility was there.
>
>
>
>                Ken
>
>
>
>
>
>                From: programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>                [mailto:programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf
> Of Storm Dragon
>                Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 11:09 PM
>                To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>                Subject: Re: Credible rumor that deserves serious 
> consideration, IMHO
>
>
>
>                Hi,
>                I would not doubt it for one second. They dropped the 
> ball on Linux
>                accessibility pretty much first thing when they took 
> over Sun.
>                It's probably a good idea, if you have influence over 
> software decisions,
>                to encourage companies, clients, and friends to stay
far
>
>                far away from Oracle and their software. I was even 
> going to get rid of
>                Open Office but fortunately the version used in Ubuntu 
> is a
>                fork so not subject to them. unless, that is, they 
> somehow manage to win
>                their evil attack on Google. If that happens, who knows

> who
>                they will attack next. Keep your fingers crossed, and 
> maybe the open
>                source community will keep the Bridge going, Orca is 
> still
>                alive and well after all.
>                Storm
>
>                --
>
>
>                Registered Linux user number 508465:
>                http://counter.li.org/
>                My blog, Thoughts of a Dragon:
>                http://www.stormdragon.us/
>                Get yourself a Frostbox:
>                http://www.frostbitesystems.com/
>
>
>                On Sat, 2010-10-09 at 08:15 +0530, prateek aggarwal
> wrote:
>
>
>                oh know,
>                i wish its just a rumor.
>                if its ever going to be true, i'll be so said.
>
>                regards,
>                prateek agarwal.
>
>
>
>                On 10/9/10, Jamal Mazrui <empower@xxxxxxxxx> 
> <mailto:empower@xxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
>
>
>                        I heard from a good source today that Oracle
has
> decided to discontinue
>                        support for the Java Access Bridge (and no 
> alternative is planned).  I
>                        would be glad to be convinced otherwise.  If 
> anyone has information
>                        regarding this topic, please share.
>
>                        Jamal
>
>                        __________
>                        View the list's information and change your 
> settings at
>                        //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind
>
>
>
>
>                __________
>                View the list's information and change your settings at
>                //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind
>
>
>                __________
>                View the list's information and change your settings at
>                //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind
>
>
>
>
>        __________
>        View the list's information and change your settings at
>        //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind
>
>        __________
>        View the list's information and change your settings at
>        //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind
>
>        __________
>        View the list's information and change your settings at
>        //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind
>
>
>        This e-mail and any attachments to it are confidential and are 
> intended solely for use of the individual or entity to whom they are 
> addressed.  If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify
the
> sender immediately and then delete it.  If you are not the intended 
> recipient, you must not keep, use, disclose, copy or distribute this 
> e-mail without the author's prior permission.  The views expressed in 
> this e-mail message do not necessarily represent the views of Highmark

> Inc., its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
>        __________
>        View the list's information and change your settings at
>        //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind
>
>
>        __________
>        View the list's information and change your settings at 
> //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind
>
>
>
>
> --
> Kerneels Roos
> Cell: +27 (0)82 309 1998
> Skype: cornelis.roos
>
> "Common Sense" is not "Common Practice" .
>
> "The Strawberry Jam Law:
>  The wider you spread it, the thinner it gets..."
>   -- from the Java Specialist Newsletter, from a book on consulting.
>
>
> __________
> View the list's information and change your settings at 
> //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind
>
> __________
> View the list's information and change your settings at 
> //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind
>
> __________
> View the list's information and change your settings at 
> //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind
>

__________
View the list's information and change your settings at
//www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind

__________
View the list's information and change your settings at
//www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind

__________
View the list's information and change your settings at
//www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind

__________
View the list's information and change your settings at 
//www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind

__________
View the list's information and change your settings at
//www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. programmingblind
  3. Archive
  4. 10-2010