RE: A question on Screen Reader Speed Standards
- From: "Homme, James" <james.homme@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 13:45:11 -0500
Hi,
I suggest that you avoid trying to control screen reader speed unless you want
to control generic stuff like for cases when someone is not using a screen
reader. That's because people might like not to have their settings changed
unexpectedly. Just my two cents worth.
Jim
Highmark recipients, Read my accessibility
blog<http://mysites.highmark.com/personal/lidikki/Blog/default.aspx>
"If a green on green tree falls in the forest and you're there, can you see it?"
"Not unless you have a screen reader." :)
From: programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Andreas Stefik
Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 12:27 PM
To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: A question on Screen Reader Speed Standards
Hi folks,
I'm working right now on trying to build up our cross platform speech engines
for the Sappy project and am trying, specifically, to get NetBeans to store
custom preferences related to screen reader speed. On Mac, we basically just
pass a flag to the TTS engine with a number, which, I suspect, is words per
minute, although I'm not completely sure. On PC, things appear to be quite
different and I'm not sure about all of the open source, and other, solutions
out there (insert your favorite technology here).
My question is, what would people suggest for standardizing the numbers for
speed of reading we use for screen readers across all platforms? For example,
does each screen reader everywhere measure speed in a different way? Should
just put everything in words per minute and not worry about it, translating any
screen reader that doesn't comply through some kind of calculation (if
possible?)? Should we just standardize through some arbitrary metric, like 0 is
the slowest and 1 is the fastest, then test everywhere to make sure those
settings are "reasonable" and that the user's system preferences are not
disturbed?
To be clear, remember that our tool has to, ultimately, be compatible with
every kind of screen reader, and should still work for the blind even if no
screen reader is present (or if the screen reader doesn't work well at all).
That's why I am asking,
Thoughts are welcome,
Stefik
________________________________
This e-mail and any attachments to it are confidential and are intended solely
for use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have
received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and then
delete it. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not keep, use,
disclose, copy or distribute this e-mail without the author's prior permission.
The views expressed in this e-mail message do not necessarily represent the
views of Highmark Inc., its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Other related posts: