There are generally two thoughts on this decision. 1. People are going to use tables for layout, allowing for role="presentation" provides an explicit method of indicating that a table is part of presentation, and not semantic. 2. Tables should never be used for presentation, all markup should be semantic and all presentation should be performed with CSS. I am on the fence, it is most likely that those using tables for layout will not know or care about role="presentation". I prefer the standardist approach, where * all * markup is for semantics, and not for presentation. That being said, is this decision really going to make a big difference on the usability accessibility of a site, likely not. Everett Zufelt http://zufelt.ca Follow me on Twitter http://twitter.com/ezufelt View my LinkedIn Profile http://www.linkedin.com/in/ezufelt On 2011-03-16, at 10:19 AM, Ken Perry wrote: > I don't see that as a step backwards since they force the role attribute. > > ken > > -----Original Message----- > From: programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:programmingblind-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John G > Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2011 9:37 AM > To: programmingblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: A Step Backwards > > Does anyone know about this? > begin extract >> Therefore, the HTML Working Group hereby adopts the "Allow tables > to be >used for presentational purposes" Proposal for ISSUE-130. Of > the Change Proposals before us, this one has drawn the weaker objections. > In short, this means that HTML5 rescinds HTML4's guidance on the use > of the table markup structure for its presentational layout > attributes, such that such use will now be HTML5-valid, provided said > table has a role attribute set to "presentation" [1]. > end extract > > __________ > View the list's information and change your settings at > //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind > > __________ > View the list's information and change your settings at > //www.freelists.org/list/programmingblind >