[program-java] Re: Ecipse online documentation accessibility

  • From: "Homme, James" <james.homme@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "program-java@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <program-java@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 08:53:42 -0400

Hi,
I will see if I can try this again, but I had some success when I have told 
Eclipse to use my web browser. Then I navigated my way to the top of the 
hierarchy for the Workbench guide, and I pressed the link to print. At that 
point, the Print dialog opened. When I closed it, I had the whole Workbench 
guide in one, big file. I gave it to Jamal Mazrui to include in his Java 
documentation zip file. If someone needs Eclipse documentation I can attempt to 
extract it again. Note that I have version 3.6 here. The documentation 
shouldn't be majorly different if you have an older version.

Jim

From: program-java-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:program-java-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of E.J. Zufelt
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2011 2:13 AM
To: program-java@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [program-java] Ecipse online documentation accessibility

Good evening,

I was taking a look at the Eclipse online documentation and notice that it is a 
terribly inaccessible mess to try to use with JAWS.  The documentation is 
somewhat easier to use with Javascript disabled, but still not easy at all.

If anyone has any tips or tricks for navigating this I would love to hear them.

Thanks,
Everett Zufelt
http://zufelt.ca

Follow me on Twitter
http://twitter.com/ezufelt

View my LinkedIn Profile
http://www.linkedin.com/in/ezufelt




________________________________
This e-mail and any attachments to it are confidential and are intended solely 
for use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have 
received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and then 
delete it. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not keep, use, 
disclose, copy or distribute this e-mail without the author's prior permission. 
The views expressed in this e-mail message do not necessarily represent the 
views of Highmark Inc., its subsidiaries, or affiliates.

Other related posts: