[procps] Re: [PATCH v2] sysctl: restore old -p handling
- From: Sami Kerola <kerolasa@xxxxxx>
- To: procps@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 21:48:54 +0200
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 9:25 PM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Friday 04 May 2012 15:07:36 Sami Kerola wrote: >> IMHO avoiding optional options still makes sense. Syntax of the >> optional arguments is exactly different than the required argument, >> which obviously is cause of confusion and therefore intolerable. > > sure, i'm fine with that. just taking offense at the commit log :). Fixed, thought it does not matter because of... > i would highlight that this will break the new behavior introduced with 3.3.2: > sysctl -p/some/file > i.e. we're going back to the previous syntax -- always requiring a space: > sysctl -p /some/file > > this release hasn't been out there for too long, so maybe no one will notice, > so it's ok. ...you are right. The latest commit is mistake. Both -p/path/to/file and -p /path/to/file need to be supported. Which puts the following patch to reject queue. https://gitorious.org/~kerolasa/procps/sami-procps-ng/commit/df68e1d653f431e53f70a1ad38955291f363f157
- Follow-Ups:
- [procps] Re: [PATCH v2] sysctl: restore old -p handling
- From: Sami Kerola
- [procps] Re: [PATCH v2] sysctl: restore old -p handling
- References:
- [procps] [PATCH] sysctl: restore old -p handling
- From: Mike Frysinger
- [procps] Re: [PATCH v2] sysctl: restore old -p handling
- From: Mike Frysinger
- [procps] Re: [PATCH v2] sysctl: restore old -p handling
- From: Sami Kerola
- [procps] Re: [PATCH v2] sysctl: restore old -p handling
- From: Mike Frysinger
- [procps] [PATCH] sysctl: restore old -p handling
Other related posts:
- » [procps] [PATCH v2] sysctl: restore old -p handling - Mike Frysinger
- » [procps] Re: [PATCH v2] sysctl: restore old -p handling - Sami Kerola
- » [procps] Re: [PATCH v2] sysctl: restore old -p handling - Sami Kerola
- » [procps] Re: [PATCH v2] sysctl: restore old -p handling - Mike Frysinger
- » [procps] Re: [PATCH v2] sysctl: restore old -p handling - Sami Kerola
- » [procps] Re: [PATCH v2] sysctl: restore old -p handling - Kent R. Spillner
- » [procps] Re: [PATCH v2] sysctl: restore old -p handling - Sami Kerola
- » [procps] Re: [PATCH v2] sysctl: restore old -p handling - Kent R. Spillner
- » [procps] Re: [PATCH v2] sysctl: restore old -p handling - Craig Small
- » [procps] Re: [PATCH v2] sysctl: restore old -p handling - Sami Kerola
- » [procps] Re: [PATCH v2] sysctl: restore old -p handling - Sami Kerola
- » [procps] Re: [PATCH v2] sysctl: restore old -p handling - Mike Frysinger
- » [procps] Re: [PATCH v2] sysctl: restore old -p handling - Mike Frysinger
- » [procps] Re: [PATCH v2] sysctl: restore old -p handling - Sami Kerola
- » [procps] Re: [PATCH v2] sysctl: restore old -p handling - Mike Frysinger
- » [procps] Re: [PATCH v2] sysctl: restore old -p handling - Sami Kerola
- » [procps] Re: [PATCH v2] sysctl: restore old -p handling - Sami Kerola
- » [procps] Re: [PATCH v2] sysctl: restore old -p handling - Craig Small
- » [procps] Re: [PATCH v2] sysctl: restore old -p handling - Sami Kerola
- » [procps] Re: [PATCH v2] sysctl: restore old -p handling - Craig Small
- » [procps] Re: [PATCH v2] sysctl: restore old -p handling - Craig Small