[ppi] [ppiindia] Serbia to be first nation charged with genocide

** Mailing List|Milis Nasional Indonesia PPI-India **
** Situs resmi: http://www.ppi-india.org **
** Situs milis: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ppiindia **
** Informasi Beasiswa Scholarship: http://informasi-beasiswa.blogspot.com **
<br><br><a href="http://informasi-beasiswa.blogspot.com";><img 
src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/Info_Beasiswa.gif"; height="67" width="200" 
style="border:0" alt="Info Beasiswa Scholarship "/></a><br><br>
http://news.independent.co.uk/europe/article347980.ece

Serbia to be first nation charged with genocide 
By Stephen Castle in Brussels 
Published: 27 February 2006 

Serbia will come under intense international scrutiny today as it becomes the 
first nation to defend genocide charges, while separately facing censure for 
failing to surrender war crimes suspects. 

Belgrade will be accused at the International Court of Justice of sponsoring 
ethnic cleansing in the 1990s which led to the worst massacres on European soil 
since the Second World War. Previously, only individuals have been charged with 
genocide, the most serious war crime.

Meanwhile, EU foreign ministers in Brussels will threaten to hold up talks on 
the creation of a free trade zone with Serbia because of Belgrade's failure to 
arrest the former Bosnian Serb military commander, Ratko Mladic.

This rebuke may not satisfy the UN's chief war crimes prosecutor, Carla Del 
Ponte, who has called on the EU to put pressure on Belgrade and privately 
pressed for a formal suspension of the negotiations.

The two events underline the extent to which the region's bloody past 
overshadows Belgrade's effort to draw closer to the EU.

Today's hearing at the World Court comes 13 years after Bosnia and Herzegovina 
first charged the Serb authorities, accusing them of the worst case of ethnic 
cleansing since the Nazis' Final Solution. Though the Serb military was not 
involved in the war, Belgrade stands accused of backing the Bosnian Serb forces.

Were the case to be proved, the Belgrade could be forced to pay billions of 
euros in compensation, as well as suffering the disgrace of being labeled a 
state sponsor of genocide.

Bosnia argues that only by acknowledging Belgrade's role in massacres there can 
reconciliation be achieved.

Genocide was outlawed under the 1948 Genocide Convention, though the first 
conviction came 50 years later when a UN court on Rwanda sentenced a former 
mayor, Jean-Paul Akayesu, to life imprisonment.

Since then, hearings at the UN's International Criminal Tribunal for the Former 
Yugoslavia in The Hague have decided that genocide took place at Srebrenica. 
The tribunal has convicted the Bosnian Serb military commanders Radislav Krstic 
and Vidoje Blagojevic of the offence.

But showing that genocide - a difficult crime to prove - was committed by a 
state will be more difficult. A paper produced by the Institute for War and 
Peace Reporting argues that genocide "requires a particular mindset - namely 
the special intent to destroy a population - which, on the face of it at least, 
appears difficult to attribute to a state".

It points out that, because Serbia's alleged sponsorship of genocide was 
through proxies, it will be even harder to prove.

The World Court may decide it does not have legal jurisdiction. A case taken by 
Serbia against Nato countries was thrown out in 2004 because Yugoslavia was not 
a member of the UN at the time. Belgrade is likely to argue that, if it cannot 
initiate a case at the World Court, if cannot be called on to defend one. 

Serbia will come under intense international scrutiny today as it becomes the 
first nation to defend genocide charges, while separately facing censure for 
failing to surrender war crimes suspects. 

Belgrade will be accused at the International Court of Justice of sponsoring 
ethnic cleansing in the 1990s which led to the worst massacres on European soil 
since the Second World War. Previously, only individuals have been charged with 
genocide, the most serious war crime.

Meanwhile, EU foreign ministers in Brussels will threaten to hold up talks on 
the creation of a free trade zone with Serbia because of Belgrade's failure to 
arrest the former Bosnian Serb military commander, Ratko Mladic.

This rebuke may not satisfy the UN's chief war crimes prosecutor, Carla Del 
Ponte, who has called on the EU to put pressure on Belgrade and privately 
pressed for a formal suspension of the negotiations.

The two events underline the extent to which the region's bloody past 
overshadows Belgrade's effort to draw closer to the EU.

Today's hearing at the World Court comes 13 years after Bosnia and Herzegovina 
first charged the Serb authorities, accusing them of the worst case of ethnic 
cleansing since the Nazis' Final Solution. Though the Serb military was not 
involved in the war, Belgrade stands accused of backing the Bosnian Serb forces.

Were the case to be proved, the Belgrade could be forced to pay billions of 
euros in compensation, as well as suffering the disgrace of being labeled a 
state sponsor of genocide.

Bosnia argues that only by acknowledging Belgrade's role in massacres there can 
reconciliation be achieved.

Genocide was outlawed under the 1948 Genocide Convention, though the first 
conviction came 50 years later when a UN court on Rwanda sentenced a former 
mayor, Jean-Paul Akayesu, to life imprisonment.

Since then, hearings at the UN's International Criminal Tribunal for the Former 
Yugoslavia in The Hague have decided that genocide took place at Srebrenica. 
The tribunal has convicted the Bosnian Serb military commanders Radislav Krstic 
and Vidoje Blagojevic of the offence.

But showing that genocide - a difficult crime to prove - was committed by a 
state will be more difficult. A paper produced by the Institute for War and 
Peace Reporting argues that genocide "requires a particular mindset - namely 
the special intent to destroy a population - which, on the face of it at least, 
appears difficult to attribute to a state".

It points out that, because Serbia's alleged sponsorship of genocide was 
through proxies, it will be even harder to prove.

The World Court may decide it does not have legal jurisdiction. A case taken by 
Serbia against Nato countries was thrown out in 2004 because Yugoslavia was not 
a member of the UN at the time. Belgrade is likely to argue that, if it cannot 
initiate a case at the World Court, if cannot be called on to defend one. 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



***************************************************************************
Berdikusi dg Santun & Elegan, dg Semangat Persahabatan. Menuju Indonesia yg 
Lebih Baik, in Commonality & Shared Destiny. 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ppiindia
***************************************************************************
__________________________________________________________________________
Mohon Perhatian:

1. Harap tdk. memposting/reply yg menyinggung SARA (kecuali sbg otokritik)
2. Pesan yg akan direply harap dihapus, kecuali yg akan dikomentari.
3. Reading only, http://dear.to/ppi 
4. Satu email perhari: ppiindia-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
5. No-email/web only: ppiindia-nomail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
6. kembali menerima email: ppiindia-normal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ppiindia/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    ppiindia-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Situs resmi: http://www.ppi-india.org ; 
Situs milis: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ppiindia ; 
Informasi Beasiswa Scholarship: http://informasi-beasiswa.blogspot.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
<br>
<a href="http://informasi-beasiswa.blogspot.com";><img 
src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/Info_Beasiswa.gif"; height="67" width="200" 
style="border:0" alt="Info Beasiswa Scholarship "/></a><br>

Other related posts: