[ppi] [ppiindia] Iran Proposal to U.S. Offered Peace with Israel

** Mailing List|Milis Nasional Indonesia PPI-India **
** Situs resmi: http://www.ppi-india.org **
** Situs milis: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ppiindia **
** Informasi Beasiswa Scholarship: http://informasi-beasiswa.blogspot.com **
<br><br><a href="http://informasi-beasiswa.blogspot.com";><img 
src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/Info_Beasiswa.gif"; height="67" width="200" 
style="border:0" alt="Info Beasiswa Scholarship "/></a><br><br>
http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=33350

POLITICS:
Iran Proposal to U.S. Offered Peace with Israel
Gareth Porter* 


WASHINGTON, May 24 (IPS) - Iran offered in 2003 to accept peace with Israel and 
cut off material assistance to Palestinian armed groups and to pressure them to 
halt terrorist attacks within Israel's 1967 borders, according to the secret 
Iranian proposal to the United States. 

The two-page proposal for a broad Iran-U.S. agreement covering all the issues 
separating the two countries, a copy of which was obtained by IPS, was conveyed 
to the United States in late April or early May 2003. Trita Parsi, a specialist 
on Iranian foreign policy at Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced 
International Studies who provided the document to IPS, says he got it from an 
Iranian official earlier this year but is not at liberty to reveal the source. 

The two-page document contradicts the official line of the George W. Bush 
administration that Iran is committed to the destruction of Israel and the 
sponsorship of terrorism in the region. 

Parsi says the document is a summary of an even more detailed Iranian 
negotiating proposal which he learned about in 2003 from the U.S. intermediary 
who carried it to the State Department on behalf of the Swiss Embassy in late 
April or early May 2003. The intermediary has not yet agreed to be identified, 
according to Parsi. 

The Iranian negotiating proposal indicated clearly that Iran was prepared to 
give up its role as a supporter of armed groups in the region in return for a 
larger bargain with the United States. What the Iranians wanted in return, as 
suggested by the document itself as well as expert observers of Iranian policy, 
was an end to U.S. hostility and recognition of Iran as a legitimate power in 
the region. 

Before the 2003 proposal, Iran had attacked Arab governments which had 
supported the Israeli-Palestinian peace process. The negotiating document, 
however, offered "acceptance of the Arab League Beirut declaration", which it 
also referred to as the "Saudi initiative, two-states approach." 

The March 2002 Beirut declaration represented the Arab League's first official 
acceptance of the land-for-peace principle as well as a comprehensive peace 
with Israel in return for Israel's withdrawal to the territory it had 
controlled before the 1967 war.. Iran's proposed concession on the issue would 
have aligned its policy with that of Egypt and Saudi Arabia, among others with 
whom the United States enjoyed intimate relations. 

Another concession in the document was a "stop of any material support to 
Palestinian opposition groups (Hamas, Jihad, etc.) from Iranian territory" 
along with "pressure on these organizations to stop violent actions against 
civilians within borders of 1967". 

Even more surprising, given the extremely close relationship between Iran and 
the Lebanon-based Hizbollah Shiite organisation, the proposal offered to take 
"action on Hizbollah to become a mere political organization within Lebanon". 

The Iranian proposal also offered to accept much tighter controls by the 
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in exchange for "full access to 
peaceful nuclear technology". It offered "full cooperation with IAEA based on 
Iranian adoption of all relevant instruments (93+2 and all further IAEA 
protocols)". 

That was a reference to protocols which would require Iran to provide IAEA 
monitors with access to any facility they might request, whether it had been 
declared by Iran or not. That would have made it much more difficult for Iran 
to carry out any secret nuclear activities without being detected. 

In return for these concessions, which contradicted Iran's public rhetoric 
about Israel and anti-Israeli forces, the secret Iranian proposal sought U.S. 
agreement to a list of Iranian aims. The list included a "Halt in U.S. hostile 
behavior and rectification of status of Iran in the U.S.", as well as the 
"abolishment of all sanctions". 

Also included among Iran's aims was "recognition of Iran's legitimate security 
interests in the region with according defense capacity". According to a number 
of Iran specialists, the aim of security and an official acknowledgment of 
Iran's status as a regional power were central to the Iranian interest in a 
broad agreement with the United States. 

Negotiation of a deal with the United States that would advance Iran's security 
and fundamental geopolitical political interests in the Persian Gulf region in 
return for accepting the existence of Israel and other Iranian concessions has 
long been discussed among senior Iranian national security officials, according 
to Parsi and other analysts of Iranian national security policy. 

An Iranian threat to destroy Israel has been a major propaganda theme of the 
Bush administration for months. On Mar. 10, Bush said, "The Iranian president 
has stated his desire to destroy our ally, Israel. So when you start listening 
to what he has said to their desire to develop a nuclear weapon, then you begin 
to see an issue of grave national security concern." 

But in 2003, Bush refused to allow any response to the Iranian offer to 
negotiate an agreement that would have accepted the existence of Israel. Flynt 
Leverett, then the senior specialist on the Middle East on the National 
Security Council staff, recalled in an interview with IPS that it was 
"literally a few days" between the receipt of the Iranian proposal and the 
dispatch of a message to the Swiss ambassador expressing displeasure that he 
had forwarded it to Washington. 

Interest in such a deal is still very much alive in Tehran, despite the U.S. 
refusal to respond to the 2003 proposal. Turkish international relations 
professor Mustafa Kibaroglu of Bilkent University writes in the latest issue of 
Middle East Journal that "senior analysts" from Iran told him in July 2005 that 
"the formal recognition of Israel by Iran may also be possible if essentially a 
'grand bargain' can be achieved between the U.S. and Iran". 

The proposal's offer to dismantle the main thrust of Iran's Islamic and 
anti-Israel policy would be strongly opposed by some of the extreme 
conservatives among the mullahs who engineered the repression of the reformist 
movement in 2004 and who backed President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in last year's 
election. 

However, many conservative opponents of the reform movement in Iran have also 
supported a negotiated deal with the United States that would benefit Iran, 
according to Paul Pillar, the former national intelligence officer on Iran. 
"Even some of the hardliners accepted the idea that if you could strike a deal 
with the devil, you would do it," he said in an interview with IPS last month. 

The conservatives were unhappy not with the idea of a deal with the United 
States but with the fact that it was a supporter of the reform movement of 
Pres. Mohammad Khatami, who would get the credit for the breakthrough, Pillar 
said. 

Parsi says that the ultimate authority on Iran's foreign policy, Iran's Supreme 
Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, was "directly involved" in the Iranian proposal, 
according to the senior Iranian national security officials he interviewed in 
2004. Kamenei has aligned himself with the conservatives in opposing the 
pro-democratic movement. 

*Gareth Porter is an historian and national security policy analyst. His latest 
book, "Perils of Dominance: Imbalance of Power and the Road to War in Vietnam", 
was published in June 2005. (END/2006) 


Send your comments to the editor


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Everything you need is one click away.  Make Yahoo! your home page now.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/AHchtC/4FxNAA/yQLSAA/BRUplB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

***************************************************************************
Berdikusi dg Santun & Elegan, dg Semangat Persahabatan. Menuju Indonesia yg 
Lebih Baik, in Commonality & Shared Destiny. 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ppiindia
***************************************************************************
__________________________________________________________________________
Mohon Perhatian:

1. Harap tdk. memposting/reply yg menyinggung SARA (kecuali sbg otokritik)
2. Pesan yg akan direply harap dihapus, kecuali yg akan dikomentari.
3. Reading only, http://dear.to/ppi 
4. Satu email perhari: ppiindia-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
5. No-email/web only: ppiindia-nomail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
6. kembali menerima email: ppiindia-normal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ppiindia/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    ppiindia-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Situs resmi: http://www.ppi-india.org ; 
Situs milis: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ppiindia ; 
Informasi Beasiswa Scholarship: http://informasi-beasiswa.blogspot.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
<br>
<a href="http://informasi-beasiswa.blogspot.com";><img 
src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/Info_Beasiswa.gif"; height="67" width="200" 
style="border:0" alt="Info Beasiswa Scholarship "/></a><br>

Other related posts: