[powerdot] Re: powerdot vs latex-beamer
- From: Władysław Tomaszewicz <wtomasze@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: powerdot@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 14:02:05 +0200
I'm not looking for lengthy input because I could always just evaluate
both classes. I'm just wondering if there is an obvious reason to use
one or the other.
Thanks a lot,
Julian Dibbelt
Hi Julian,
IMHO the more essential difference between the classes is as follows:
Beamer accepts two ways of compiling source files:
1. LATEX => DVI => PS => PDF (using LaTeX, Ghostscript and Ps2Pdf),
2. LATEX => PDF (using PDFLaTeX),
whereas Powerdot accepts only first way. So, if you want directly
include, e.g., *.jpeg pictures into presentation, you should use Beamer.
With best regards,
--
Dr hab. Wladyslaw Tomaszewicz
----------------------------------------------------------
Faculty of Applied Physics and Mathematics
Gdansk University of Technology
80-952 Gdansk, Narutowicza 11/12, Poland
phone: +48 58 347 16 50
fax: +48 58 347 28 21
e-mail: wtomasze@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.mif.pg.gda.pl/kfze/staff/WTomasze/Wtomasze.html
----------------------------------------------------------
- Follow-Ups:
- [powerdot] Re: powerdot vs latex-beamer
- From: Luis Sequeira
- References:
- [powerdot] powerdot vs latex-beamer
- From: Julian Dibbelt
Other related posts:
- » [powerdot] powerdot vs latex-beamer
- » [powerdot] Re: powerdot vs latex-beamer
- » [powerdot] Re: powerdot vs latex-beamer
- » [powerdot] Re: powerdot vs latex-beamer
- » [powerdot] Re: powerdot vs latex-beamer
I'm not looking for lengthy input because I could always just evaluate both classes. I'm just wondering if there is an obvious reason to use one or the other. Thanks a lot, Julian Dibbelt
- [powerdot] Re: powerdot vs latex-beamer
- From: Luis Sequeira
- [powerdot] powerdot vs latex-beamer
- From: Julian Dibbelt