[pov] Fwd: A Look Into: DSLRs Vs MILCs - Hongkiat.com

Thought some of you might enjoy reading this post or sending it on to someone.  
This is a new blog I have started following.  He covers various kind of tech.

Viv Ilo 


Begin forwarded message:

From: hongkiat.com <editor@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: A Look Into: DSLRs Vs MILCs - Hongkiat.com
Date: June 24, 2012 9:03:48 AM PDT
To: *|FNAME|* <vividweb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: hongkiat.com <editor@xxxxxxxxxxxx>


A Look Into: DSLRs Vs MILCs
Published on: 06/24/2012
So what’s the hype over mirror-less cameras like Samsung NX, Sony α NEX, Pentax 
Q? To be honest, I don’t have much of an idea on what the term ‘mirror-less’ in 
cameras meant before writing this article. I did some research to find out 
what’s so great about these increasingly popular cameras. They have to be good 
for something if peple are saying that MILCs have capacity to compete with 
Digital Single-lens Reflex (DSLR) cameras.



Recommended Reading: 20+ Ideal Gifts For Photographers

What’s the Fuss?

To be specific, when people speak of a ‘mirror-less’ camera, they are usually 
referring to aMirrorless Interchangeable-lens Camera (MILC). Like compact 
cameras or point-and-shoot digital cameras, MILC does not carry a mirror within 
the camera itself, hence "Mirrorless". This is in contrast to DSLR cameras 
which require a mirror to project the light that goes through the lens, for the 
photographers to see the image they wish to take through an optical viewfinder, 
a core characteristic of DSLR cameras.


(Image source: cnet.com)

Compact cameras either don’t have a viewfinder, or will replace the TTL 
viewfinder with an electronic viewfinder (EVF). Instead, these cameras are 
fixed with small sensors, resulting in poorer imaging especially in low-light 
conditions, due to the inability to capture enough light, compared to DSLR 
which carry large sensors. MILCs, also carries large sensors, producing 
high-quality DSLR-like imaging. In addition, as you can tell from the term 
‘interchangeable-lens’, MILCs gives one the option to switch lenses, thus 
affording the same level of flexibility as that of DSLRs.

With or Without Mirror

For DSLRs, the mirror is a movable part that reflects light into the TTL 
optical viewfinder. When you wish to capture what you see on the viewfinder, 
you press the shutter. The mirror will move and reflect the light to a sensor 
which then transmits the color data onto an image processor. This image 
processor eventually translates the data into a color image which will then be 
saved in memory.


(Image source: GadgetVenue)

Without the mirror system in MILCs, the lenses can be placed closer to the 
sensor. This means that high-quality lenses do not have to be as big as those 
in DSLRs, which translates to cheaper and lighter cameras and lenses. As a 
result, the selling point of MILCs over DSLRs is that they are more affordable 
and portable, yet can still yield quality images that can rival their larger 
counterparts.

The Comparison

So in a direct comparison between a DSLR and an MILC, which one will end up on 
top? Let’s have a look at the factors you need to put into consideration to 
find a clear winner between the two.

The Absence of Optical Viewfinder in MILCs

As there is no optical viewfinder in MILCs, photographers have to rely on 
‘live’ LCD screens at the back of the camera or electronic viewfinders (EVF) to 
take their shots. With EVFs, images captured by the camera lens are projected 
electronically onto a miniature display for easier aiming. Some photographers 
would prefer an optical viewfinder to ensure that what they see is what they 
are shooting.


(Image source: dpreview.com)

Electronically transmitting images from the lens to ‘live’ LCD screens or EVF 
display may produce a noticeable lag between changes in the scene and the 
electronic display. It’s no wonder that when it comes to LCD screens and 
viewfinders, some photographers prefer to take the shots by looking through the 
camera than the screen.

Size & Weight

The mechanism involving the moving mirror and the TTL optical viewfinder 
requires a substantial amount of space within the camera. As a result, DSLR 
cameras are bulky. On the other hand, MILCs are able to make itself much more 
portable, at least until you add in a zoom lens. Even so, it is still lighter 
and more compact than DSLRs.


(Image source: discoverdigitalphotography.com)

Ergonomics

Not surprisingly, the larger DSLRs actually feel more at ease in your hands 
than the compact camera and MILCs. This is especially so if you have large 
hands (i.e. guys). The larger size affords for more curves where you can 
comfortably wrap your fingers around the DSLRs for a more stable hold, which is 
good for better image production.


(Image source: Spice)

Autofocus Speed

DSLRs utilize a phase-based autofocus system instead of the contrast-based 
autofocus system commonly used for MILCs. The result is that the latter has a 
slower focus speed. What this means is that MILCs will have some issues when it 
comes to capturing movement shots like those of sports photography or in any 
other scenarios when a millisecond can make a real difference in your shots.

Range of Lenses / Equipments

Owing to the longer history of DSLRs as compared to MILCs, there is a greater 
range of lenses and other photography equipment that are made specifically for 
DSLRs but not MILCs. That said, some MILCs like the Samsung NX10 allow you to 
use an adapter so that you can put on most lenses from major brands such as 
Nikon, Canon, Minolta, etc that were originally designated for DSLRs.


(Image source: Siniro Life Press)

Battery Power

To keep the size compact, batteries for MILCs are smaller and won’t last as 
long as the batteries for DSLRs. While a single battery for a DSLR typically 
lasts a day of shooting, you might need a pair for MILCs to perform at the same 
level. Furthermore, DSLRs offers you the option of taking pictures either by 
looking through the optical viewfinder (no battery required) or the LCD screen. 
Without that optical viewfinder, MILCs make you completely reliant on the LCD 
screen or the electronic viewfinder which drains the power at a quicker rate.

So Which One’s Right for You?

MILCs produce high-quality images that are comparable to those taken from DSLRs 
and even offer the flexibility of interchangeable lenses. That said, you have 
also seen the above comparisons between both types of cameras and have a feel 
of the pros and cons of each.

I guess it all boils down to the priority you place on the various features and 
functions on a camera. For instance, if you’re someone who prefers speedy 
movement shots, an MILC is obviously less superior to a DSLR due to its slower 
autofocus speed. If you find it extremely cumbersome to lug the the bulky DSLR 
bag along with the heavier lenses behind you everywhere you go, then the 
compact MILC is definitely more appealing to you.

Related posts:

Guide to Purchasing Your First Digital Camera


Share This Article:
                  
You are receiving this email because you subscribed to get latest hongkiat.com 
post via email.

Copyright (C) 2012 Hongkiat.com All rights reserved.

Hongkiat.com
AMK Street 11, Avenue 1
Singapore 560303
Singapore

Add us to your address book







Sent to vividweb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx — why did I get this? 
unsubscribe from this list | update subscription preferences 
Hongkiat.com · AMK Street 11, Avenue 1 · Singapore 560303

Other related posts:

  • » [pov] Fwd: A Look Into: DSLRs Vs MILCs - Hongkiat.com - Viv Ilo E. Veith