[phpa] Re: Cached "static" PHP vs HTML

Oh and there are webservers that focus on serving static contant like
Tux and X15 for Linux that can push an amazing amount of data. They do a
lot of funky stuff to get I/O time down to the absolute minimum.

The nice thing is that atleast Tux can be configured to forward any
request it can't or should not handle to another webserver like apache
or zeus

So there is a lot to gain from real static content versus pseudo static
content that is run through php.

Btw: anyone know the status of dynamic content via tux or x15?

Best regards
Lukas Smith
smith@xxxxxxxxx
_______________________________
 DybNet Internet Solutions GbR
 Reuchlinstr. 10-11
 Geb=E4ude 4 1.OG Raum 6 (4.1.6)
 10553 Berlin
 Germany
 Tel. : +49 30 83 22 50 00
 Fax : +49 30 83 22 50 07
 www.dybnet.de info@xxxxxxxxx
_______________________________

> -----Original Message-----
> From: phpa-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:phpa-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Mark Rogers
> Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 10:18 AM
> To: phpa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [phpa] Re: Cached "static" PHP vs HTML
>=20
>=20
> > [Snip loads of useful info]
>=20
> I'm glad I asked now; there's lots of useful info come out of it.
>=20
> As far as generating static HTML from PHP is concerned, what method do
you
> use? Presumably you don't do it manually.
>=20
> Sorry, this has drifted a bit OT now.
>=20
> Mark Rogers, Quarella Ltd
> Tel: 0845 45 89 555
>=20
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>   www.php-accelerator.co.uk           Home of the free PHP Accelerator
>=20
> To post, send email to phpa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe, email phpa-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with subject
unsubscribe
>=20


------------------------------------------------------------------------
  www.php-accelerator.co.uk           Home of the free PHP Accelerator

To post, send email to phpa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe, email phpa-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with subject unsubscribe

Other related posts: