[pedevel] Re: A couple of questions...
- From: Linus Almstrom <linalm-7@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: pedevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 01 May 2004 18:30:31 +0200
On 2004-05-01 at 18:01:42 [+0200], Axel D=F6rfler wrote:
> Ingo Weinhold <bonefish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On 2004-05-01 at 12:37:59 [+0200], Oliver Tappe wrote:
> > > Should we change Pe's behaviour to use B_CONTROL_KEY in order to free=
=20
> > > the
> > > cursor-keys for menu-shortcuts? And does it make sense to use=20
> > > B_OPTION_KEY
> > > for word-wise navigation, too, or would you prefer using it for yet=20
> > > some
> > > other kind of navigation (which one)?
> > I don't what default settings were in Pe, but I changed it to basically=
=20
> > resemble the ones in BeIDE. Being:
> >=20
> > Cmd-Left/Right: move to begin/end of line
> > Cmd-Up/Down: move to begin/end of document
> > Opt-Left/Right: move to previous/next word begin/end Opt-Up/Down: move=
=20
> > to begin/end of page
> >=20
> > Unfortunately lacking is the following feature:
> >=20
> > Ctr-Left/Right: move to previous/next word part begin/end (e.g. in C/=20
> > C++=20
> > identifiers like =60my_function', and =60MyClass').
> >=20
> > This holds for a B_COMMAND_KEY =3D=3D Alt setup, at least.
>=20
> Eddie has those key bindings, too.
> I think we should definitely add the previous/next part of word feature,=
=20
> as it is more than handy.
> I would vote for changing the shortcuts to match BeIDE's and Eddie's.=20
> BTextView should have those, too, if you ask me :-)
I hope we are talking of default behaviour now, because I see no reason why=
=20
this could not be configurable like BeIDE and Eddie. Eddie has a really=20
flexible shortcut configuration, which I would really like to see in Pe too.
Regards
/Procton
Other related posts:
