-=PCTechTalk=- Re: WinMX 2.6 vs 3.2
- From: "andy" <info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <pctechtalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 14:32:57 +0100
I've tried just about all of them, and after Audio Galaxy went, Kazaa Lite
(NOT the full edition-it's full of spyware) or BearShare are about the best
around...Win MX was fine, but for some reason, the queues have become so
long, it's impossible to download anything.
Here's a link that might help you
http://www.afternapster.com/
Cheers
andy
----- Original Message -----
From: <HandsomeBlck@xxxxxxx>
To: <pctechtalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 2:03 PM
Subject: -=PCTechTalk=- Re: WinMX 2.6 vs 3.2
> In a message dated 7/22/2002 5:24:17 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
> NetLord@xxxxxxx writes:
>
>
> > Do you have a URL to post for NapMX? Sounds interesting.
> >
>
> MNL,
> I used google, went to their site. They had some reviews on it. If I
> remember correctly, of 5 reviewers didn't recommend it.
To unsub or change your email settings:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/pctechtalk
To access our Archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PCTechTalk/messages/
http://www.freelists.org/archives/pctechtalk/
- References:
- -=PCTechTalk=- Re: WinMX 2.6 vs 3.2
- From: HandsomeBlck
Other related posts:
- » -=PCTechTalk=- Re: WinMX 2.6 vs 3.2
- » -=PCTechTalk=- Re: WinMX 2.6 vs 3.2
- » -=PCTechTalk=- Re: WinMX 2.6 vs 3.2
- » -=PCTechTalk=- Re: WinMX 2.6 vs 3.2
- » -=PCTechTalk=- Re: WinMX 2.6 vs 3.2
- » -=PCTechTalk=- Re: WinMX 2.6 vs 3.2
- » -=PCTechTalk=- Re: WinMX 2.6 vs 3.2
- » -=PCTechTalk=- Re: WinMX 2.6 vs 3.2
- » -=PCTechTalk=- Re: WinMX 2.6 vs 3.2
- » -=PCTechTalk=- Re: WinMX 2.6 vs 3.2
- » -=PCTechTalk=- Re: WinMX 2.6 vs 3.2
- -=PCTechTalk=- Re: WinMX 2.6 vs 3.2
- From: HandsomeBlck