-=PCTechTalk=- Re: WinMX 2.6 vs 3.2
- From: Jenelle Vollmer <jen51us@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: pctechtalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2002 08:18:32 -0700 (PDT)
I am about to give up on it too, the other version was much better and not as
much queing. What is a real good alternative?
Jen
HandsomeBlck@xxxxxxx wrote:In a message dated 7/20/2002 4:33:14 PM Pacific
Daylight Time,
info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
> I've given up on Win MX-Huge queues for absolutely everything
Andy,
OK. Do you use a P2P program?
HB
To unsub or change your email settings:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/pctechtalk
To access our Archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PCTechTalk/messages/
http://www.freelists.org/archives/pctechtalk/
Jenelle Vollmer
jen51us@xxxxxxxxx
For every minute you are angry with someone, you lose 60 seconds of happiness
that you can never get back.
---------------------------------
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better
To unsub or change your email settings:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/pctechtalk
To access our Archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PCTechTalk/messages/
http://www.freelists.org/archives/pctechtalk/
- References:
- -=PCTechTalk=- Re: WinMX 2.6 vs 3.2
- From: HandsomeBlck
Other related posts:
- » -=PCTechTalk=- Re: WinMX 2.6 vs 3.2
- » -=PCTechTalk=- Re: WinMX 2.6 vs 3.2
- » -=PCTechTalk=- Re: WinMX 2.6 vs 3.2
- » -=PCTechTalk=- Re: WinMX 2.6 vs 3.2
- » -=PCTechTalk=- Re: WinMX 2.6 vs 3.2
- » -=PCTechTalk=- Re: WinMX 2.6 vs 3.2
- » -=PCTechTalk=- Re: WinMX 2.6 vs 3.2
- » -=PCTechTalk=- Re: WinMX 2.6 vs 3.2
- » -=PCTechTalk=- Re: WinMX 2.6 vs 3.2
- » -=PCTechTalk=- Re: WinMX 2.6 vs 3.2
- » -=PCTechTalk=- Re: WinMX 2.6 vs 3.2
- -=PCTechTalk=- Re: WinMX 2.6 vs 3.2
- From: HandsomeBlck