-=PCTechTalk=- Re: OT Re: Re: Proper edict
- From: "Mike the mod" <mikebike@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: pctechtalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 15:52:33 -0800
Try sending a message to the Group-owner address
CROCKPOT-RECIPE/-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I'm not sure tat is the correct address but you could try it.
Mike the mod
******* REPLY SEPARATOR *********
On 1/29/2008 at 3:21 PM ML wrote:
top o this group announces when you try to get on to join page. you can't
get in if you are NOT a memember??? go figure that one. mmmmmmm
CROCKPOT-RECIPE Sorry, this group is available to members ONLY.
You are not allowed to access this group.
----- Original Message -----
From: Jo Ann Weaver
To: pctechtalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 12:42 PM
Subject: -=PCTechTalk=- Re: OT Re: Re: Proper edict
KC,
Here is the link to the crockpot lists
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CROCKPOT-RECIPE/
---------------------------------------------------------------
Please remember to trim your replies (including this sentence and everything
below it) and adjust the subject line as necessary.
To unsubscribe or change your email settings:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/pctechtalk
To access our Archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PCTechTalk/messages/
http://www.freelists.org/archives/pctechtalk/
To contact only the PCTT Mod Squad, write to:
pctechtalk-moderators@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
---------------------------------------------------------------
- Follow-Ups:
- -=PCTechTalk=- Re: OT Re: Re: Proper edict
- From: Jo Ann Weaver
- References:
- -=PCTechTalk=- Re: OT Re: Re: Proper edict
- From: Jo Ann Weaver
- -=PCTechTalk=- Re: OT Re: Re: Proper edict
- From: ML
Other related posts:
- » -=PCTechTalk=- Re: OT Re: Re: Proper edict
- » -=PCTechTalk=- Re: OT Re: Re: Proper edict
- » -=PCTechTalk=- Re: OT Re: Re: Proper edict
- » -=PCTechTalk=- Re: OT Re: Re: Proper edict
- » -=PCTechTalk=- Re: OT Re: Re: Proper edict
- » -=PCTechTalk=- Re: OT Re: Re: Proper edict
- » -=PCTechTalk=- Re: OT Re: Re: Proper edict
- » -=PCTechTalk=- Re: OT Re: Re: Proper edict
- » -=PCTechTalk=- Re: OT Re: Re: Proper edict
- » -=PCTechTalk=- Re: OT Re: Re: Proper edict
- » -=PCTechTalk=- Re: OT Re: Re: Proper edict
- » -=PCTechTalk=- Re: OT Re: Re: Proper edict
- » -=PCTechTalk=- Re: OT Re: Re: Proper edict
- » -=PCTechTalk=- Re: OT Re: Re: Proper edict
- » -=PCTechTalk=- Re: OT Re: Re: Proper edict
- » -=PCTechTalk=- Re: OT Re: Re: Proper edict
- » -=PCTechTalk=- Re: OT Re: Re: Proper edict
- » -=PCTechTalk=- Re: OT Re: Re: Proper edict
- » -=PCTechTalk=- Re: OT Re: Re: Proper edict
- » -=PCTechTalk=- Re: OT Re: Re: Proper edict
- » -=PCTechTalk=- Re: OT Re: Re: Proper edict
- » -=PCTechTalk=- Re: OT Re: Re: Proper edict
- » -=PCTechTalk=- Re: OT Re: Re: Proper edict
- » -=PCTechTalk=- Re: OT Re: Re: Proper edict
- » -=PCTechTalk=- Re: OT Re: Re: Proper edict
- » -=PCTechTalk=- Re: OT Re: Re: Proper edict
- » -=PCTechTalk=- Re: OT Re: Re: Proper edict
- » -=PCTechTalk=- Re: OT Re: Re: Proper edict
- » -=PCTechTalk=- Re: OT Re: Re: Proper edict
- -=PCTechTalk=- Re: OT Re: Re: Proper edict
- From: Jo Ann Weaver
- -=PCTechTalk=- Re: OT Re: Re: Proper edict
- From: Jo Ann Weaver
- -=PCTechTalk=- Re: OT Re: Re: Proper edict
- From: ML