-=PCTechTalk=- Re: Is 98 better than XP?
- From: "Wyatt M. Portendt" <nunyabidness6@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: pctechtalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2003 00:32:56 -0500
Yup, that's pretty much what I said.
On 6/4/2003 at 12:29 PM a whisper was heard, and the one known as Andy was
rumoured to have uttered....
| ----- Original Message -----
| From: "Wyatt M. Portendt" <nunyabidness6@xxxxxxxxx>
| To: <pctechtalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
| Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 1:08 AM
| Subject: -=PCTechTalk=- Re: Is 98 better than XP?
|
|
| > In this list and others, I've seen mostly positive comments
| about XP from
| > people who have new hardware, and horror stories from those
| trying to run
| > it on older unsupported hardware. The only really negative
| comments I've
| > seen are mostly from people trying to upgrade an older
| computer to XP and
| > people who like Linux and Windows 2000. I didn't count
| them, but it was
| > overwhelming enough to not have to.
|
|
| I think the bottom line has to be 'If it's not broke, don't
| fix it'...If you
| are running W98, chances are your PC came from the era of that
| o/s
| (1997-1999). While it may reach the spec for installing and
| running, if W98
| is doing all you want it to, why bother taking the risk? Leave
| it until you
| find yourself having to upgrade your hardware. In my case, I
********* And So It Was ***********
To unsub or change your email settings:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/pctechtalk
To access our Archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PCTechTalk/messages/
//www.freelists.org/archives/pctechtalk/
For more info:
//www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/list?list_id=pctechtalk
Other related posts:
