-=PCTechTalk=- Re: Insomnia and NTFS Cluster Size :)
- From: "Grant Karpik" <gkarpik@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: pctechtalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 14:17:05 -0700
Yeah, win2k's and XP's conversion utility converts to 512k clusters
which is really inefficient. Dunno why MS has it set up like that. :(
On 26 Apr 2003 at 12:40, *=C7=F5$m=EF=A2* wrote:
> Ok thanx grant .. I had to concert some parts and I know they are not
> 4096 and I was thinking about changing them ..
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"A good end cannot sanctify evil means; nor must we ever do evil that
good may come of it"
...William Penn, 1683
Grant Karpik
gkarpik@xxxxxxxxx
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To unsub or change your email settings:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/pctechtalk
To access our Archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PCTechTalk/messages/
http://www.freelists.org/archives/pctechtalk/
For more info:
http://www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/list?list_id=pctechtalk
- Follow-Ups:
- -=PCTechTalk=- Networking with 2 NIC trouble
- From: *~-= NeFoX =-~*
- References:
- -=PCTechTalk=- Re: Insomnia and NTFS Cluster Size :)
- From: *Çõ$mï¢*
Other related posts:
- » -=PCTechTalk=- Re: Insomnia and NTFS Cluster Size :)
- » -=PCTechTalk=- Re: Insomnia and NTFS Cluster Size :)
- » -=PCTechTalk=- Re: Insomnia and NTFS Cluster Size :)
- -=PCTechTalk=- Networking with 2 NIC trouble
- From: *~-= NeFoX =-~*
- -=PCTechTalk=- Re: Insomnia and NTFS Cluster Size :)
- From: *Çõ$mï¢*