-=PCTechTalk=- RFID implant in hospitals FDA ok'd
- From: "Bashful Bob" <Bashfulbob@xxxxxxx>
- To: "PCTT" <pctechtalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 10:24:22 -0600
http://news.zdnet.co.uk/communications/wireless/0,39020348,39170368,00.htm
Subcutaneous RFID tags upset privacy advocates
Munir Kotadia
ZDNet Australia
October 15, 2004, 11:40 BST
The US Food and Drug Administration has approved a plan to allow hospitals to
place RFID tags under patients' skin, much to the chagrin of privacy advocates
Privacy advocates are outraged at the US Food and Drug Administrations'
approval of using RFID chips inside humans for medical purposes.
According to Applied Digital Systems, the US-based company that makes the
chips, the FDA approved its RFID chips on Wednesday for use in hospitals on
humans. The approval came after a year-long review.
The VeriChip, which is about the size of a grain of rice, is designed to be
injected into the fatty tissue of the arm. Using a special scanner, doctors and
other hospital staff can fetch information from the chips, such as the
patient's identity, their blood type and the details of their condition, in
order to speed treatment.
However, for security purposes personal information is not stored on the chip.
Instead the chip contains a unique number - like a barcode - that links to a
medical record stored on a secure database.
But Australian privacy advocates, who were already wary about similar chips
being used by retailers to help manage their supply chain, are furious that
humans could be chipped and wonder how long it will be before the first
Australians are implanted.
Roger Clarke, a privacy advocate who has been speaking out against RFID-type
technology for more than a decade, said he was "appalled and stunned" at the
naivete of both the people developing the technology and the way it is being
reported in the general press.
"When I spoke about this in 1994 people said I was going to extremes and
talking nonsense. Now, less than ten years later they have a commercial
product. I cannot understand how naive people are," said Clarke.
Clarke has argued that although the US solution is a simple identifier chip and
can only be used with the consent of the patient, it won't be long before the
technology goes mainstream.
"We are always going to tag the institutionalised first -- because they are
prisoners and we have power over them. But we are also going to tag grandma in
the senile dementia ward," said Clarke.
"This is a unique identifier. You will be walking down the street saying hey,
this is my number, because your chip is promiscuous and it will talk to any
bloody thing that wants to talk to it. It is unbelievable," Clarke added.
However, a spokesperson from the Australian Institute of Criminology (AIC), a
Commonwealth statutory authority, said Australia has never electronically
tagged any of its criminals and has no plans to do so in the future.
"Tagging of criminals is not even on the agenda," the spokesperson said.
Dale Clapperton, a board member for Electronic Frontiers Australia, a
non-profit organisation that represents the on-line rights and freedoms of
Internet users, said he is just as worried about RFID chips being used in every
day objects such as driving licences and passports.
"If we went down the path of putting RFID tags into driving licenses - which
has been suggested in some parts of the US -- you could have a situation where
anyone with the right equipment could read information from your licence from a
few metres away," Clapperton said.
Any type of RFID chip - whether inserted inside the body, in a document or item
of clothing - will affect an individual's privacy, said Clarke.
David Vaile, executive director of the Baker & McKenzie Cyberspace Law and
Policy Centre at the University of New South Wales, said the US Patriot Act
makes it unclear exactly which information is protected and which is readily
available.
In addition, he said that because RFID chips are unlikely to ever be removed
once they are inserted, and RFID scanners are becoming more common, the privacy
issues are spiralling out of control.
"If you jumped into boiling water you would jump right out again. But what
happens when the temperature is gradually raised? This looks like another
increment and the water is not cool any more -- it is actually getting quite
warm," said Vaile
Life is what happens in between plans.
Virus free email by Norton's
This message is intended for the sole use of the individual and/or entity to
which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not
the addressee, or authorized to receive this on behalf of the addressee, you
are hereby notified that you may not use, copy, disclose, or distribute to
anyone this message or any part thereof. If you have received this in error,
please immediately advise the sender by e-mail and delete this information.
Thank you
To unsub or change your email settings:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/pctechtalk
To access our Archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PCTechTalk/messages/
http://www.freelists.org/archives/pctechtalk/
For more info:
http://www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/list?list_id=pctechtalk
Other related posts:
- » -=PCTechTalk=- RFID implant in hospitals FDA ok'd