[pchelpers] Re: question please
- From: John Durham <john.modec@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: pchelpers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 16:20:51 +1200
Whatever the modem was, it was unlikely to have been a software driven
winmodem. They are PCI cards and require a minimum of a pentium 150 to
work. Can't remember seeing any 486 machines with PCI slots (although
there may have been some). There were, however some ISA type internal
modems that were very well made and were hardware driven. These would be
the equal of any external modem at the same speed.
Are you sure the external one you had wasn't a 33.6k model or even a
28.8k?
Nigel wrote:
>
> The old Lucent winmodem I used to have in my 486-100 ALWAYS gave me
> better
> download speed than the poxy external one I am now using on my modern
> computer! Apart from portability, I would prefer an internal one.
>
> There. I've mentioned internal modems AND win modems!!! Twice I have
> sinned.
>
> Nigel
--
Regards, John Durham <mailto:modec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
ICQ number 112663246
Fax/Phone 64 4 5286786
Award winning web site at http://modecideas.com?sig
Order my latest e-book at http://modecideas.com/dmaxhits.htm?sig
PC-HELPERS list subscribe/unsub at http://pchelpers.5er.com?sig
Referralware http://www.referralware.com/home.jsp/101728230
P.S. In case you're interested in such things, here is the most
effective tool for getting masses of people to visit your website I have
found:
http://www.startblaze.com/cgi-bin/r_sb.cgi?id=11590&c=sbsigman2
Good advice is like good paint- it only works if applied.
- Follow-Ups:
- [pchelpers] Re: question please
- From: Nigel
- [pchelpers] PDA People?
- From: Ed
- References:
- [pchelpers] Re: question please
- From: Scott McNay
- [pchelpers] Re: question please
- From: John Durham
- [pchelpers] Re: question please
- From: Nigel
Other related posts:
- » [pchelpers] question please
- » [pchelpers] Re: question please
- » [pchelpers] Re: question please
- » [pchelpers] Re: question please
- » [pchelpers] Re: question please
- » [pchelpers] Re: question please
- » [pchelpers] Re: question please
- » [pchelpers] Re: question please
- » [pchelpers] Re: question please
- » [pchelpers] Re: question please
- » [pchelpers] Re: question please
- » [pchelpers] Re: question please
- » [pchelpers] Re: question please
- » [pchelpers] Re: question please
- » [pchelpers] Re: question please
- » [pchelpers] Re: question please
- » [pchelpers] Re: question please
- » [pchelpers] Re: question please
- » [pchelpers] Re: question please
- » [pchelpers] Re: question please
- » [pchelpers] Re: question please
- » [pchelpers] Re: question please
- [pchelpers] Re: question please
- From: Nigel
- [pchelpers] PDA People?
- From: Ed
- [pchelpers] Re: question please
- From: Scott McNay
- [pchelpers] Re: question please
- From: John Durham
- [pchelpers] Re: question please
- From: Nigel