[pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- From: "Ekhart GEORGI (last name last)" <Ekhart.GEORGI@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: pchelpers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 08:55:03 +0300
Hi Pen Pal
> Yes I understand I just got ride of the blue color but initially that was
> all I wanted to do I didn't think there was a problem. I must admit my idea
> of slow may not really be slow I just notice it wasn't as fast as usual. I
> was doing my weekly updating and scanning and it had just defragged and all
> that stuff excuse my use of the word stuff! ( ~ :
>
> I have never compressed files and thought maybe that was why the pc seemed
> slower then usual. Before I compressed it had about 15. something of free
> space after I compressed it went to 18.3 GB used and 18.8 GB free and the
> capacity says 37.2 GB. Seemed compressing helped but maybe it was a mistake?
I'm confused; are you saying the computer speeded up or slowed down due
after compression?
Also, are you saying you initiated the compression or that it happened
by itself? AFAIK, compression is automatic and on by default in the NTFS
version of XP (which you seem to have), and i don't know (i have FAT,
not NTFS) if it happens all the time for a few files at a time or if it
starts a major operation and therefore probably first asks for
permission before monopolising the computer for that for a while.
--
-------list-services-below-----------
Regards, John Durham (list moderator) <http://modecideas.com/contact.html?sig>
Freelists login at http://www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi
List archives at http://www.freelists.org/archives/pchelpers
PC-HELPERS list subscribe/unsub at http://modecideas.com/discuss.htm?sig
Latest news live feeds at http://modecideas.com/indexhomenews.htm?sig
Good advice is like good paint- it only works if applied.
- Follow-Ups:
- [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- From: Pen Pal
- [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- From: Scott McNay
- References:
- [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- From: John Durham
- [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- From: Pen Pal
- [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- From: John Durham
- [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- From: Pen Pal
- [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- From: John Durham
- [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- From: Pen Pal
- [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- From: John Durham
- [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- From: Ekhart GEORGI (last name last)
- [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- From: Pen Pal
- [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- From: Ekhart GEORGI (last name last)
- [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- From: Pen Pal
Other related posts:
- » [pchelpers] perplexed
- » [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- » [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- » [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- » [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- » [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- » [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- » [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- » [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- » [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- » [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- » [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- » [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- » [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- » [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- » [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- » [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- » [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- » [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- » [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- » [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- » [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- » [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- » [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- » [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- » [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- » [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- » [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- » [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- » [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- » [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- » [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- From: Pen Pal
- [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- From: Scott McNay
- [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- From: John Durham
- [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- From: Pen Pal
- [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- From: John Durham
- [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- From: Pen Pal
- [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- From: John Durham
- [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- From: Pen Pal
- [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- From: John Durham
- [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- From: Ekhart GEORGI (last name last)
- [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- From: Pen Pal
- [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- From: Ekhart GEORGI (last name last)
- [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- From: Pen Pal