[pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- From: "Ekhart GEORGI (last name last)" <Ekhart.GEORGI@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: pchelpers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 08:35:03 +0300
Hi Pen Pal
>> I'm surprised that installing the software slowed it down as much as
>> you seem to think. I'd suspect something else, such as fragmentation,
>> or junk in the registry and temporary folders. A run with CCleaner
>> may help.
> +++++++++
> Well I have installed more then one program and they were big.
No amount of program *downloading* should slow down your computer in any
way unless you start using up the last minimum of about 1 GB of empty
space necessary for correct functioning of XP.
Not even any amount of program *installation* should slow down your
computer in any way unless you make or let them run in the background
and start automatically when the computer starts. Do you have lots of
unnecessary program icons next to the clock in the system tray? (renamed
notification area in XP)
Did you ever install Startup Control Panel
http://www.mlin.net/StartupCPL.shtml or some other startup control program?
--
-------list-services-below-----------
Regards, John Durham (list moderator) <http://modecideas.com/contact.html?sig>
Freelists login at http://www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi
List archives at http://www.freelists.org/archives/pchelpers
PC-HELPERS list subscribe/unsub at http://modecideas.com/discuss.htm?sig
Latest news live feeds at http://modecideas.com/indexhomenews.htm?sig
Good advice is like good paint- it only works if applied.
- Follow-Ups:
- [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- From: Pen Pal
- References:
- [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- From: John Durham
- [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- From: Pen Pal
- [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- From: John Durham
- [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- From: Pen Pal
- [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- From: John Durham
- [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- From: Pen Pal
- [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- From: John Durham
- [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- From: Ekhart GEORGI (last name last)
- [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- From: Pen Pal
- [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- From: Scott McNay
- [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- From: Pen Pal
Other related posts:
- » [pchelpers] perplexed
- » [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- » [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- » [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- » [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- » [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- » [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- » [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- » [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- » [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- » [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- » [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- » [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- » [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- » [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- » [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- » [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- » [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- » [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- » [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- » [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- » [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- » [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- » [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- » [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- » [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- » [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- » [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- » [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- » [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- » [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- » [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- From: Pen Pal
- [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- From: John Durham
- [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- From: Pen Pal
- [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- From: John Durham
- [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- From: Pen Pal
- [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- From: John Durham
- [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- From: Pen Pal
- [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- From: John Durham
- [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- From: Ekhart GEORGI (last name last)
- [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- From: Pen Pal
- [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- From: Scott McNay
- [pchelpers] Re: perplexed
- From: Pen Pal