[pchelpers] Re: [pchelpers]
- From: "Scott McNay" <wizard@xxxxxxxx>
- To: <pchelpers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2002 09:51:32 -0500
Yes, but don't you need the Access runtime modules (DLL files)? The
Access applications that I've seen (two of them, I think) still install
the Access support files (DLLs, etc.).
--Scott.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Ford
> Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2002 6:53 am
> You can do this by creating a stand alone executable which
> refers to the various libraries of your database. In fact I
> am in the process of creating such a stand alone program
> using Access. I am working on a team that has generated a
> program using Access 97 and knowing that everyone may not
> have Access available especially an older version like 97, we
> are creating a stand alone executable that will run the
> Access 97 database all by itself. The executable is written in C++.
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dr.Thair Alithary
> > Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 1:25 am
> > Usually I use ACCESS to build databases,I hope I can compile these
> > databases to stand alone programs . How can I do that? Regards
- Follow-Ups:
- [pchelpers] Re: [pchelpers]
- From: John Ford
- References:
- [pchelpers] Re: [pchelpers]
- From: John Ford
Other related posts:
- » [pchelpers] Re: [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] Re: [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] Re: [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] Re: [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] Re: [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] Re: [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] Re: [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] Re: [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] Re: [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] Re: [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] Re: [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] Re: [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] Re: [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] Re: [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] Re: [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] Re: [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] Re: [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] Re: [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] Re: [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] Re: [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] Re: [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] Re: [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] Re: [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] Re: [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] Re: [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] Re: [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] Re: [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] Re: [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] Re: [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] Re: [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] Re: [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] Re: [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] Re: [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] Re: [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] Re: [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] Re: [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] Re: [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] Re: [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] Re: [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] Re: [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] Re: [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] Re: [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] Re: [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] Re: [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] Re: [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] Re: [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] Re: [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] Re: [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] Re: [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] Re: [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] Re: [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] Re: [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] Re: [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] pchelpers
- » [pchelpers] Re: pchelpers
- » [pchelpers] Re: [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] Re: [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] Re: [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] Re: [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] Re: [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] Re: [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] Re: [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] Re: [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] Re: [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] Re: [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] Re: [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] Re: [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] Re: [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] Re: [pchelpers]
- [pchelpers] Re: [pchelpers]
- From: John Ford
- [pchelpers] Re: [pchelpers]
- From: John Ford