[pchelpers] Re: outlook express question
- From: "Ekhart GEORGI (last name last)" <Ekhart.GEORGI@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: pchelpers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 12:31:22 +0300
Hi Scott and Re-Na
> We went around on this before; she wanted to be able to receive emails
(the same emails)
> on both the laptop and desktop. So... they should BOTH be set to keep
> mail, but to delete after so many days.
Yes, that was my suggestion. But as i also suggested back then, Re-Na
*can* regularly and easily empty the *server* mailbox by simply having
computer B set to not leave on server *if* she makes sure she always
first checks for email with computer A. If she never checks for email
with B except immediately after checking with A, there is little chance
of not also getting everything on A.
The other, 100% sure method is to have the "leave on server" setting on
both computers but with a number of days high enough to ensure that she
has a chance to also check (and download) with computer B before the
emails are automatically removed by the time limit but with a number of
days low enough to prevent overflow of the *server* mailbox. This method
sometimes requires either temporarily turning of that setting or
manually deleting unnecessary, large emails (in the *server* mailbox)
directly using the webmail if she suddenly unexpectedly receives one
huge or several large emails that immediately fill up her *server*
mailbox to the brim.
> If she tends to get huge
> emails, then the inbox on the server might still get full. Many ISPs
> used to have a limit of about 1 meg or so, which is small for people
> who send files around.
As i also said back then, if she has a very low size limit for her
server mailbox and sometimes can't use computer B (with "don't leave on
server") to empty the server (because she's somewhere else than where B
is), she should simply go to the ISP's website and delete any large
unnecessary emails still there using the delete button *in the webmail*.
In any case, Re-Na, please try to remember that your ISP is *not* or
should not be talking about the mail stored in your email programs when
they say your mailbox is too full.
They may either have badly trained staff or think they're saving staff
time by offering the "solutions" of either turning off the "leave on
server" setting or of deleting email in an email program.
They may think they're saving staff time but they're probably actually
wasting it (and losing customers) by not explaining about the correct
solutions of a) temporarily turning off that setting (after downloading
into all email programs or if one only has one computer and/or email
program) or b) also using a second email program with that setting
turned off or c) telling people to use the webmail interface to delete
unnecessary, huge emails.
There is also the very real possibility that they didn't explain at all
or clearly enough that deleting email in webmail may only move this to
the webmail's trash. Anything in there will continue to be counted as
filling up the *server* *mailbox* (there usually isn't a limit only on
the server's *inbox*). Re-Na may simply need to empty her webmail's
trash bin.
Re-Na, many people have almost all (non-spam) email they ever received
stored in their email program, and this is usually no problem even with
the setting "leave on server", as long as the number of days is low
enough and one doesn't get too many large attachments every day.
Please consider one or several of these 6 solutions:
1) check whether there is a trash folder in the webmail that doesn't
empty itself automatically (stuff only goes there when you delete email
in the webmail). And you *do* have these settings in TB and OE, don't you?:
TB: (leave messages on server) until i delete or move them from Inbox
OE: remove from server when deleted from Deleted Items
2) regularly empty the *server* mailbox using computer B with the
setting "leave on server" turned off, and only immediately after
checking for mail with computer A
3) if you're on a trip and can't use computer B to empty the server, use
the webmail to do this or temporarily turn off the "leave on server"
setting on A. (BTW, if you're on a trip and using a slow modem
connection, you can use Thunderbird's handy "fetch headers only" setting
to not have to wait and pay for downloading huge emails you don't need
before you get back)
4) If you don't like using the webmail, you can also use Thunderbird to
remove any individual emails you want from the server: simply
temporarily move them out of the folder they are in (for example, press
Delete) and then put them back after checking for mail. I seem to
remember this didn't work in OE, but there may be a similar trick. I
think this may work (try first with an unimportant email): save an email
on your desktop, delete it in OE, check for mail, and then just drag it
back into OE from the desktop.
5) buy more mailbox space. This may be necessary if, as Scott guesses,
you may get so many emails with big attachments or a few emails with
such huge attachments that your *server* mailbox immediately fills up
even in a few hours. How big is your ISP's limit and how many gigabytes
of family albums do you get per week?
6) tell people to not send many attachments at once and to not send
files larger than size X (which can be estimated based on the size of
the mailbox and the number of large emails you get on average per week)
--
-------list-services-below-----------
Regards, John Durham (list moderator) <http://modecideas.com/contact.html?sig>
Freelists login at http://www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi
List archives at http://www.freelists.org/archives/pchelpers
PC-HELPERS list subscribe/unsub at http://modecideas.com/discuss.htm?sig
Latest news live feeds at http://modecideas.com/indexhomenews.htm?sig
Good advice is like good paint- it only works if applied.
- References:
- [pchelpers] outlook express question
- From: G. R. Hanson
- [pchelpers] Re: outlook express question
- From: Ekhart GEORGI (last name last)
- [pchelpers] Re: outlook express question
- From: G.R. Hanson
- [pchelpers] Re: outlook express question
- From: Ekhart GEORGI (last name last)
- [pchelpers] Re: outlook express question
- From: Scott McNay
Other related posts:
- » [pchelpers] outlook express question
- » [pchelpers] Re: outlook express question
- » [pchelpers] Re: outlook express question
- » [pchelpers] Re: outlook express question
- » [pchelpers] Re: outlook express question
- » [pchelpers] outlook express question
- » [pchelpers] Re: outlook express question
- » [pchelpers] Re: outlook express question
- » [pchelpers] Re: outlook express question
- » [pchelpers] Re: outlook express question
- » [pchelpers] Re: outlook express question
- » [pchelpers] Re: outlook express question
- » [pchelpers] Re: outlook express question
- [pchelpers] outlook express question
- From: G. R. Hanson
- [pchelpers] Re: outlook express question
- From: Ekhart GEORGI (last name last)
- [pchelpers] Re: outlook express question
- From: G.R. Hanson
- [pchelpers] Re: outlook express question
- From: Ekhart GEORGI (last name last)
- [pchelpers] Re: outlook express question
- From: Scott McNay